My claims of self-defense, being a controversy.

Then why does not the law put a stop to crime,

when its intent then was verified?

As I was yelling out to give it a list of foresight there and then.

Was it the first time confessing or second?

 

I do not want to. Who would want to harm another person,

unless they did something unforgivable?

Or in pursuit of harm?

Unless they are socio-psychopaths.

 

But the problem is, nobody sees it as harm.

Not when the fucker was committing a hate crime,

not when it was on advertising its own prejudice, confirming that hate crime,

not when it was framing and then confessing,

allowing it to compete, allowing it to speak out in mocking my being,

asserting my identity as sovereign right.

 

And as it continues these lethal framing.

As it assasinates my character repeatedly,

suicidal, some kind of pact to attack myself?

At the stakes of law, knowing.

It continues to try destroying my identity.

 

And still. Still. Would you see this as a mere theft?

 

This will go on forever, and they are heinous evil.

They mean to make my life ruinous.

They mean to destroy my life.

 

I have no idea what I will do,

if you do not do something about this.

 

I just ask that you do not see it as mere theft.

Because it is not.

This is intentional destruction of a life.

And these people are malice itself.

 

They mean to stay.

They mean to continue.

 

I apologize for my expressions of self-defense.

But there are speaks of even letting them go.

I say to that, you are all insane.