you have got to let me in now authorities......

 

sigh........

 

the channel look like it is hidden from the search engines....

 

 

 

 

every incrimination points on steve, must be organized, by division of categories.

present then in the house: emails, situations by monitoring, unreasonable lies, statements from previous contradicted over time.

present in the channel (beginning the confession): how it began, what it did (framing), no participation n the competition, what led to confession, why the confession, what was absent in the confession and how there cannot be to alleviate itself of charges.

present in the channel (post-confession): its stance, environmental change, sudden reviving from previous framing after confession, acolytes conspiring together sudden lies. laura's role, despite her saying, by the relays, her acolyte role was 'small'. no. fundamentally aimed to make my life runious. this person is no different from steve. but especially as there is no confession, this person aims to continue harm. same punishment should be applied.

blatant lies caught, its intent caught, its repeating offense caught, impossibilities of no foresight, no records, only force, force, force. gaslighting, gaslighting, gaslighting. stories after stories, character assassination one after the other.

many things i have written and forgetting to mention here. but all facts should be organized.

 

please understand in this situation, he stakes were destruction, obliteration.

by the mass scale of ideas they framed me for, and after occurance of others who were trying to kill me, it would have ended up in my death penalty. and death in every other areas of my life. if not suicide by obliteration. a zero sum game they attempted aiming for the highest of highs to assign lowest of the lows to the person. it is akin to attempted murder. and attempted murder where applicable.

this laura, supported steve in doing this. aiming for my destruction. her roles were not small at all. i am only being fair.

i am lenient on females usually, but this person isn't it.

the law shouldn't be lenient either.

 

 

again. none of what they say has any base. no records, and i cannot control this in any form.

their memory alone would have been their defense as foresight in this duration spread out as years.

and the house itself being monitored, and between themselves as communication.

that won't exist, unless steve relayed to laura my ideas as his to impress her.

even then, you would see by the timing it is my ideas,

as it would present by itself as his,

to the audience and the investors. knowing the house is being monitored. (which is in the emails)

knowing the stakes.

and towards myself as well. knowing my email in communication.

this so-called asserting its ideas and being "thwarted" of it, is a bogus lie.

there was no reason for any dedication, nor was it all that believable for him.

nor knowing that audience and investors watching, monitoring, why wouldn't it

take control over to itself? as much communication to audience and investors much as I.

nor why would it waste 300+ days not competing, had it could?

why framing and then confess to theft?

it's a process it built itself on. and then tries to take my ideas to devour, to win.

 

 

and the reason why they do this,

is because i am alone.

and i work alone.

 

and these are baseless accusations in order to exploit someone who is alone.

 

no confession would exist either. confession that would have held this fabricated past, then.

to save itself. the confession was that of the entirety.

 

"one *jump ahead", "smooth criminal" is impossible.

had i list of their ideas,

the only logical thing for me to do,

is take the chance of presenting it whole,

as fast as possible.

 

for their memory alone as foresight, would destroy me.

 

so before that happens, you present immediately.

 

of course, i came up with my ideas as i went, trying to come up with something valuable.

periodically. like in a week by week basis. rather slowly.

 

everything they say is a lie.

 

understand the fears a person would have presenting someone else's work whilst blind.

 

it just frames you for something that is impossible.

 

and in mass numbers, this is called intent of destruction by unreasonable force/deceit.

 

 

 

i re-iterate same things i say.

because people don't seem to get it the first time around.

 

you must understand how it is simply impossible.

 

 

and understand the past of confession. why that is confession of the entirety,

and situation in the house being monitored.

 

if these idiots tried stealing few.

that may have had merit.

but under that bogus lie of mass ideas.

 

they will be destroyed by their stupidity.

 

and no. there was not even 1 idea that was steve's.

it would be mentioned in the emails as records,

knowing the oppportunity of investors,

and by the monitoring.

 

this is about exploiting someone who is alone and working alone.

with baseless stories it is making up.

and with character assassinations.