"You've already won and you don't even realize it yet."

No. I think the court is confused on its objective.

 

The court is not about mercy and saving as many as possible.

(Though I will agree to this)

 

The objective is to STOP HARM from spreading. Repeating itself.

 

If otherwise, my freedom isn't a "win".

 

It is only an illusion of freedom while harm manifests by the same perpetrators.

 

So objective is primarily, justice, to the relentless, senseless, brutal evil.

That knows no reason or civility. But only manifests more chaos through its intent.

 

Other perpetrators, I believe it is finite. Their harm.

Then with it, ends with adequate punishment.

 

 

Apologies for my speculation. I do not mean to insult the authorities.

But benevolence and mercy should not be the default setting.

Rather it should be calculated in relation to, intent for repeating harm.

 

 

 

Harm spreads, more casualties.

I don't think it's only me who will be the victim to that.

So the few who causes this chaos and keeps at it with their intent.

They must be charged for, without lenience.

 

 

 

Another logic:

When Steve, keeps/kept at it with ludicrous amount of ideas as framing.

(I do not know at this point whether at this point it has confessed or not,

since i am seeing these lies of pact and such, and collaborative with the environment targeting,

meaning it has confessed to an extent, but it doesn't seem entirely)

But I still see it trying to steal I believe, so I say this logic:

 

When you know that amount of numbers is a lie,

and during this theft, with this lies intact,

it tries to thieve whatever it is.

 

Why wouldn't that be a lie also?

 

It is absolved by the intent, and also the logic internal to the situation/idea that would rid of the doubt it is creating.

 

So please dismiss it.

 

It believes creating doubt and ambiguity over if even 1 idea remains that way means its freedom.

 

But like I said, it doesn't work that way.

 

That would be deliberately lopsiding an advantage for the attacker by cherry-picking,

deliberately focusing on the ambiguity and doubt it creates,

 

when there are a hundred other instances that has proven its lies and intent.

 

So it is absolved by its endlessly repeating deeds and intent.

That is the only logical outcome.

 

I am saying, one cannot fall for what is obviously pathological lying,

aiming to distort reality, gaslight.

 

Its attacks, pursuit of harm, intent for deceit and destruction is already BASED.

Its repeating harm of the same nature is BASELESS.

 

We must end the cycle.