have the fucker go through lie detector test as suggested by zuckerberg.

it can't bypass all those lies with schizophrenia.

each and every framing counts then. don't you think so.

problem is, law doesn't see this as an adamant, reliable solution.

polygraph is stress testing, A.i assist is based on imaging.

but, in that majority of numbers, you will figure out...

 

 

but here is also the solution.

that MASS. can be seen without the need for it.

nobody only follows up without a foresight.

not in that duration spread out.

not in-between every reminder had ideas existed before.

it would have presented moment it came on to the channel.

 

and THAT is what the authorities should be aiming as incrimnation point,

alongside evey other factoids and evidence, such as emails and logical situation in the house (monitored and access to communication)

this intent of framing a person for the mass theft of ideas = attempted murder.

few would be theft.

but not in mass.

and the stupid thing is, when that few as ambiguity should be absorbed to that mass,

and dismissed as intent to harm.

you flip this to his advantage.

as if few ambiguity gives him the right to try murdering a person. destroying a person.

no, it doesn't work that way.

no crime is justification for 'amplification' towards another crime for completely different outcome. even if the few ambiguities were real as theft.

am i making sense?

why do you lopside and reason things out to his endless advantage, when you should be on my side?

impossibilities of what it suggests as mass theft is clear.

then it gets what it deserves for playing a zero-sum game.

 

 

lethality is behind its intent to continue.

and you have seen that, clearly.

even aimimg for ideas i've cautiously created connecting to the space escalator

because as far as i observed that is what it directly confessed on.

and you have so much other evidences, and repeating partial confessions only to continue itself.

 

this is after a person's freedom of life. to subjugate and control by framing.

when it persists these zero-sum games...

authorities, be fair.

what does it deserve?

 

if you feel hesitant in order to save laura...

i feel that if they are playing the same game, with same context,

then the punishment should be equal.

 

but in steve's case. it far exceeds beyond the realm of framing.

hate crimes and assertion of identity, character assassinations exist.

violations above and beyond.

 

in laura's case, i believe assertion of identity (love triangle) which would also make my relationship prospect in jeopardy,  

and physical threats? having seen the percy jackson relay. when i was trying to give her chances to confess.

though that mass framing, that is the main thing. she means to destroy my identity for their gains as well. no foresight as a GROUP. nor interaction with me in that way as record, if stated such a thing, which is ridiculous.

it is about creating a baseless story. when they know i am isolated. and they are isolated by themselves. they create doubt through deceit.

framing is complete intent to control. to destroy a life.

 

steve and his brother deserves capital punishment.

laura, i don't know. i'll leave it to you.

but i doubt she should be alleviated from any punishment.