just understand the impossibility of mass ideas without foresight from steve and his acolytes

and how i would know about that.

and when that is fronted, anything that was within that framework = a lie.

or anything before its first major confession, which had no statements pertaining to theft,

or relating to it as correlating ideas. (if that major confession was about the space escalator, then anything related to cubes)

 

so when or if anyone tries to give it individual chances after knowing its intent.

 

this is essentially baseless repeating cycle of abuse the victim must endure.

 

please don't let it continue.

 

it has always been a FOLLOW UP.

even as triggers of the reminder of ideas,

 directly pertaining to it,

would exist prior.

and it would give a foresight,

had it existed with steve.

 

all it does is brazen, shameless, force and lies.

and it must be apprehended.

 

 

and like i said, if you insist on fronting an ambiguity,

which is inevitable at times perhaps.

then use my logic. that absolute outcome.

a charismatic ruling of who presented first, simply wins.

this is not because i'm the perpetrator in any sense.

this is to protect the victim that is myself,

from its repeating intent.

 

 

but even as you apply this.

there is the question of ALL it has done.

which was under that mass a number,

it was attempted murder,

and destruction of a life,

under impossible excuses.

so it must be charged for that intent.

as it continues now.

 

 

please don't let it create a cycle of harm, abuse.

 

 

there was also nothing gay about me and steve.

it is twisting things to its demented imagination

and admitted to this before.

it tried framing me with homosexual activity i believe.

witnesses please speak out on that confession.

so it is constantly trying on defamation and destruction of character

to apply harm.

 

 

i asked zuckerberg to help me on uncovering the truth before on the

advanced polygraph, or ai reading thoughts.

problem is this.

what if it force believes itself?

what if that schizopherenic tendency is a portal for itself to remain in that state?

that wouldn't be fair for me.

then here is another thing.

when it knows that it is psychotic,

then it should not try to harm a person.

it should withdraw.

but what you see is repeating partial confessions,

contradicting excuses,

gaslighting the past,

and personal attacks of character, character assassinations in its malice.

then the court, must see its INTENT.

instead these endless creation of narratives and impossible excuses.

even schizophrenia has 2 qualities.

1. it would remember its own memories had it  existed, therefore foresight.

2. and awareness that it is sick in the mind, so not to trust itself.

none of that moral and logical characteristic exists but heinous intent to harm.

since the beginning, by "gay bashing" and following a major confession which

not included anything it says now, as its defense.

so court must see the logic of it all.

 

it holds no morality.

it holds no conscience either.

these are two dangerous, lethal factors.

and its intent is in clarity.