Hey, Monica. Are you there?

I can't remember exactly who it was I was complaining about.

But wasn't I complaining about someone constantly locking their room with their key

as they used the bathroom?

To which you replied, that is in their right and it is procedure?

 

I am writing this, because I think that was Steve I was complaining about.

So that would be in alignment to its paranoia,

leaving the bathroom door open several inches as it was using the sink.

And at other times, as it would shower or stay in there for a long time,

would lock the door.

 

His room and my room is just beside the bathroom itself,

about 2.5 meters away from it.

so the point was, the fucker, knowing that i'm borrowing $20 from him,

it was paranoid I would steal something from his room.

 

That is why i'm writing that message in the email.

"Even if my investment don't work out, I wouldn't enter your room."

Even if I was still poor.

And stating it is an unbelievable story and unbelievable amount to him.

If anything was established as its direct participation in business and ideas,

I would not be saying that. This is 2 months before he moved out.

 

It had its own path in MBA. And beside the stairs, beside the table, which is between the kitchen and the bathroom, that is where Festus and Steve spoke about his prospects of an MBA. Festus giving him advice on an MBA, that is why I asked Steve to introduce him.

Because I can overhear from my room, very close proximity.

This is also 2 months before he moved out.

I've shown the dates on the email communication.

 

 

There were no ideas mentioned, nor "thwarting" of any ideas.

Had there been, it would simply write on screen or give a phone to one of his friends,

and the monitoring situation would immediately recognize this,

to the audience and the investors.

 

And it is saying that was under the premise of recognizing the monitoring,

and recognizing that there are investors watching, correct?

Nor, why wouldn't it speak to me over the email?

 

It is all a bogus lie.

 

I don't know how much it confessed, but judging by the reactions from what I speculated yesterday, it confessed *most to get away from capital punishment.

Because I said, mass framing = destruction, few = theft.

But no.

In this case, confession of the mass framing is admission of intent to destroy.

And further intent to mess with my life and its partial confessions following.

Alleviation of capital punishment, which has been insinuated all this time,

can only be applied when there is FULL confession and no more intent to harm that is established.

Otherwise, this person is there to destroy my life in its lethal vanity.

Being parasitic.

 

It must work against him. Not help him.

Please understand. This person is a heinous, brutal person.

You should know that knowing how it started.

And confessed. Only to revive itself as the environment changed.