Everyday, something new comes up.

People trying to kill me with a new story.

 

If what these fuckers are saying is real,

why would it say so after YEARS,

to something that would have been that memorable and symbolic?

 

And following all other points of accusations towards me,

directly related to such a thing?

 

They are all lies.

 

 

And these people think it's FUN.

FUNNY.

 

To fuck with my life.

And to help Steve.

 

They think, destroying me, is to save other people.

 

But no. Authorities, vigilantism or jealousy is by no means of

justification for attempting destruction on another person's life,

who has done no wrong.

 

These people must be charged.

 

 

Please search through my emails and see reports on landlord and his family's abuse

during those times.

There was passive violence from upstairs, deliberately aiming at myself.

They were I believe charged at the time.

 

 

They too, are people driven by wrong motives.

They are gamblers to someone else's life.

 

 

 

Again. The commonality of their excuses in one word:

 

is,

 

"amnesia"

 

conveniently adapting to the changing events,

and stating they have forgotten.

 

As they assert harm.

 

It is impossible.

 

You are aware of their intent.

 

 

And Steve's father's stance as well.

He directly accused Steve of theft did he not, in numerous occasions.

So if that relay by Mayumi is true,

then how can that even align.

 

Whatever is going on, it is a lie.

My ideas are my own.

I am not suicidal.

Nor is it possible for them to have no foresight.

 

People really have to recognize this.

 

It just is, impossible.

 

And throughout all the lies caught,

that is far beyond "3 strikes" law.

Meaning you have figured out its INTENT.

 

And there can be no more contestation to front an ambiguity.

There would be no ambiguity, if you counted the fact that there was interaction

and reciprocation of my ideas, meaning there never was an overlap.

And Steve was a follow up.

 

But you count other factors, when you should not.

When the intent is figured out,

you still hold on to doubt to favor my attacker.

 

This is wrong. If anyone is doing this.

Be clear.

You already know its intent,

and the court is aware of this now.

 

You can no longer front its baseless doubts to attack my ideas.

 

i can forgive a lot of things but framing isn't one of them.

and the law shouldn't either.