"Do you know what you've done?"

"Your life is in danger."

And Rufio from Peter Pan dying.

 

Exactly what are you framing me for?

What are you blaming me for?

 

Trying to expose a crime relying on witnesses for verification?

There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

 

What is in question is this.

That history exists.

And furthermore, it was deleted, whilst in the court.

That compendium of all interactions between yourselves.

What other reason is there but to rewrite history,

as abuse revived itself?

 

So look into it.

Don't blame me.

 

Work with the witnesses.

 

And like I said, bring about every possible permutations of investigation

into the witnesses.

 

You were looking at the wrong angle. Wrong timeline.

Never listening to me, or others.

 

Those were the important points and we are on the right track now.

 

Apologies for my blaming towards you. Nothing personal.

But I am correct in that we are on the right path now.

 

What else? When the confessions existed?

 Yes everything else counts as well,

but that is the determining evidence.

 

And stop being swayed by their persuasion.

I am not the killer.

 

I am exposing crimes.

 

"Do you know what you've done?"

Goes to Mr Musk. As question.

Or whomever was in charge.

 

Not the blind guy who was attacked with it.

 

Always victim-blaming.

Please wake up.

 

 

Another question.

Shall we fall silent to the truth,

when the investigative points and witnesses are present?

 

Then what are you blaming me for?

We do what is expected of us.

That is all.

 

 

If anyone says, that confession wasn't that of the entirety.

It logically would not make sense. By what follows.

And when there are contradictions from other witnesses.

You know who to trust.

It's not anyone supporting the repeating offense.

 

 

---------

No idea what the attacks towards me is about.

At all.

 

It is exactly in alignment to our next questions.

 

Seeing Gal Gadot's no man's land here.

How can this still come up?

When you idiots don't measure who came up first with the idea,

and there was interaction?

What the fuck is this?

 

You are desperate to frame a person.

That is what is going on.

 

Everything Steve did was a FOLLOW UP.

If otherwise, it would have given you a LIST of ideas as a FORESIGHT.

It does not have amnesia nor its friends.

Nor the amount of ideas even pertinent to possibility of a theft.

Nor am I capable of presenting that is someone else's in this situation,

but especially that supposed person is on the channel.

 

What the fuck are you trying to do, against LOGIC?

 

So when confession was it. That was the entirety.

 

And someone out there is framing me.

 

Do you understand?

 

When it lied about the whole thing,

of course the confession was the entirety.

 

So whomever is making things up right now,

is making things up.

 

DO you understand this logic?

 

Now I apologize if that is not the issue.

 

But whatever it is,

 

pretty damn sure you are all deluded idiots.

 

No. I do get mad.

I have that right.

 

Why the fuck would death penalty go on to me?

For someone trying to expose a crime based on your relays of

previous history of confession,

and that is the most important thing to discover?

 

 

You people, gathered in there. you are all insane.

 

Bunch of fucking idiots.

 

Evidence is right there before you and you still choose ignore it.