"illegal migrant"

 

Anna invaded me. I called the police.

That is the beginning point prior to any investment offer. Invasion.

Releasing humiliating video on net of which the police did not help, nor did anyone else.

 

Then Adam gave me an opportunity for investment.

Then Elon gave me an opportunity for investment.

 

I followed through.

 

Exactly what of this is illegal 'migrant' when you were the ones who invaded us?

 

Does it look like I have any technical control over any of this?

 

Insurrecting matters previously resolved only shows your intent to harm.

 

 

--------

7 years ago, in the very beginning even prior to that video release by Anna.

Was Anna's hacking inside my computer.

And releasing my screen on public display I believe.

So people were observing.

I only realized she was doing this, when Becky suddenly relayed on my desktop background.

Which was a girl sitting down in a library on opposite side of the table.

I was lonely so I pretended I had a girl to converse with.

 

So I was completely OBLIVIOUS.

 

I didn't call the police because that would get Anna in trouble.

Nor did anyone call the police.

 

I recall commenting, out of the whim, and daydream, "I wish people could see me playing games on screen." (so they would see how good I am)

but I didn't know that was really happening, initiated by Anna.

 

So there are no technical involvement in my part.

It was all Anna's CHOICE.

 

Spamming as well.

I spoke about collect "@" addresses in crunchbase.org (which is an investor association, of they willingly list their email addresses to contact) and using a macro to send them investment opportunity on Cellagen.

This isn't invasion. They opted to be contacted.

 

What Anna did was a conscious choice of her own, to illegally spam the world.

I never asked her to do this.

Not anything illegal.

 

So it was her choice on the matter and I was oblivious to how massive spamming it was.

All I could understand is random Quorans started upvoting things between myself and Anna.

She wanted to announce our relationship prospect and whats happened into the world.

So people can kind of 'convince' me into being with her. (I believe as these are the relays I sensed)

This happened after she was allegedly forced on her physical intimacy by a person in her college, lost her virginity, then became suicidal and I sent her caring letters to dissuade her from it.

 

And after I was refusing her, unsure of prospect. People were saying to get together generally. And making me feel old in comparison so she's a catch and all that...

Does anyone remember those days? Elena?

 

So what started off as an expression of love, and people kind of trying to unite us.

Saying it's no big deal. The loss of virginity. Or to deter. Depending on their view.

 

Became what this is today.

 

And to call me the illegal migrant....

 

I believe your point begins on who offered the investment opportunity and asked to come up with ideas.

That was your citizens.

 

I never invaded. I was the one who called the police to have it stopped.

 

 

All invest offer opportunity = yourselves.

I simply lived up to it.

 

People, you must play fair.

 

After all, my ideas are about HELPING YOUR nation.

You breach this, and make it look like it was my 'invasion'.

 

When it was Anna who did this,

and Adam offered investment seeing how pitiful a state I was in.

 

The first message by Adam through the upvote, as I put him in the observation deck in order to contact him. I believe he looked at my screen and communicated to me first. Unsure of the order.

 

It was "hoboken" = referring to me.

then "don't use my blood!" (as in quora)

 

to which I was explaining to Adam the situation with Anna and how I am being abused.

Being isolated from the channel and nobody is giving me the link.

 

Instead him giving me the channel link,

Adam decides to just follow what everyone else does,

and keeps on communicating by the relays.

 

And much later. He gives me an investment opportunity.

 

 

 

 

So exactly what of this is my control?

 

Why do you keep victim-blaming, people?

 

 

--------

repeating important parts.

 

-----------

 

 

whatever it is you  are arguing about,

i made my defense before.

but conveniently you dismiss this.

look through my files again.

if you are not properly informed, then do not speak until you are.

 

you can try to force your blame on me somehow.

but look at me.

 

i'm behind a screen.

i can't be the one whose in control, can I?

 

so you idiots believing you can turn  the table around.

your argument is already flawed fundamentally.

 

look into it. all records are there.

what can i possibly do in this situation?

 

 

 

they tried framing me before, Anna and the gang.

so look into my statements before as well.

they will conveniently dismiss that.

this is insurrection relying on your surface level reasoning,

knowing that you, the new government will try to take advantage of it.

 

but it's been long resolved.

 

 

and see how many times they did this.

what can you blame me for? what!

 

that is crazy.

 

 

it's really simple.

i'm someone locked  behind a screen since anna.

 

and if anna is trying to shift the blame.

and if there is 'harm' the best i can do is text.

and that text wasn't anything so bad either.

misconduct perhaps, thwarting her of her advancement towards me as relationship prospect.

 

but just words. literally. she didn't even see my face at the time.

 

but if these people are blaming a stranger.

when they abused me.

and they made their choices for extremities.

when i just wanted better for them.

 

no. again. see whats happened.

 

 

i dodged a bullet that was anna.

and in her spite, she made her choices.

i am the victim.

 

differentiate what is true harm.

words are just words. = which is all i can do. and not so bad either.

actions are actions. = which is everything  they did. which was damaging and lethal.

 

do you see the difference?

 

so these idiots are tryng to persuade people again,

justifying their ACTIONS of harm,

when it was their own control they initiated,

because they were bad character.

 

do you see that is the ONLY conclusion?

 

but they can't and won't differentiate that SIMPLE reality.

because why?

out of control ego!

EVERYTHING IS JUSTIFIED TO THEM.

 

and if i say something wrong, out of REACTION of their abuse,

even knowing it is their abuse, i apologized.

but again they comveniently take that out and justify themselves don't they?

 

fucking idiots just trying to gaslight all the time.

 

trust in that i meant well for them,

and look into the exchange.

 

it is THEM. they are horrifyingly controlling, abusive people.

 

they constantly frame, omitting details lopsided to their advantage.

all was resolved and over between themselves and i.

they went on relentless pursuit of unnecessary harm.

 

so please look into it. it's all there.

in fact, i was being a saint, dropping their charges and trying to save them from capital punishment.

how do you think the court resulted in that over and over and over again?

because they are guilty, and court heard my detailed statements long ago.

 

now i see what is going on again.

new government.

past hidden.

new authorities.

cycle of framing.

 

 

keep the recent previous authorities who are in assessment of all this.

the 4 people and 1 at the top.

they should know better.

they are informed.

if you dismiss them,

that is obstruction of justice and manipulation of the court and the law.

 

if you deliberately deny history or act like you don't remember.

that is also fraud.

 

please be fair.

 

 

understand we went through this impossible number of times and in detail last 7 years!!!

 

there is no way in hell, you are getting away rewriting history if you simply listen to their misleads and framing.

 

it's all been covered before!

 

why are people staying silent?

 

 

 

 

 

witnesses please speak out.

of their actions, my defense to their framing, and the court's outcome on their guilty verdict.

 

please fight back.

 

 

insurrection of the court on convicted people, to set them free.

there is attempts at control here again.

please do not.

the previous court, knows better.

there is a reason they were charged for capital punishment.

 

 

it is not about whether they are guilty or not.

that is long concluded.

it is about trying to lessen damages to their lives and my own at this point.

do you know why they got into that horrifying state?

it's because Biden kept giving them chances to frame me!

and they dug a deeper hole for themselves.

it;s the same now and chaos only grows bigger,

and casualties grow bigger as it becomes a conspiracy rewriting history.

 

please let the authorities handle it.

the judicial branch whose always been at this.

collect all evidences and organize.

when executive branch tries to thwart that,

problem becomes bigger as you are not informed.

 

 

 

do you all still have the pdf files i uploaded?

per attacker.

 

 

it is very possible all that biden has done,

carries over to whomever further helps his deeds to manifest.

 

don't fall for that trap.

 

let the authorities whose been assessing these cases for very long time now,

do their work.

 

interfering is like running into the flame thinking one is invincible.

you cannot be.

 

because what these people have done,

is INSANELY wrong.

there is no way out of it by narratives and propaganda.

or exploitation of any form.

 

truth will always be present.

 

even if you believe you are doing the better thing by supporting these people convicted.

why would they be convicted in the first place?

 

don't help them. not in the midst of the court.

once they are found guilty,

then one can do something about lessening damages...

 

 

 

things such as:  fronting their repeating, already resolved framing, trying to change the outcome of the court,  or by dismissing the previous verdict, dismissing involvement of the authorities, or speaking loudly on their framing while you have not heard from me a defense statement, or hiding my prevous statements, or supporting people whose been caught in repeat for framing.

is all wrong.

against the law.

if that is happening.