Apologies to Mr Trump for my paranoia,

but authorities, your time for action is now.

It could be now or never,

if Mr Trump decdes to antagonize me.

Your interval for chance of action is only until he is reinstated into power.

Sigh...

 

Then another cycle begins.

 

Please contact.

 

Mr Trump. It's been 7 years. I never 'invaded' your country, I was a victim of this girl, Anna,

by cyberbullying. I only adhered to the challenge Mr Musk gave, for the benefit of your country.

I am not an enemy.

Please have sympathy for my situation. I am willing to negotiate.

 

This was an conflict between Biden admistration and the current court,

who raised conflict by exploiting the cyberbullying Anna started.

I should have been given fair obseration, fair defense for this court.

It is only fair I am contacted, for fair defense and negotiation.

 

So I say this in my paranoia that Mr Trump will folow the same path of setting someone

in this state of lockdown.

This was cowardly of Biden.

And I do not think Mr Trump will be this low.

He would first bring me into the table for fair defense.

 

Please don't intervene as the authorities tries contact.

Or please encourage them to do so Mr Trump.

 

-------------

Steve keeps creating doubt. Impossible excuses while knowing my situation.

I am seeing he is free to stay as he is so as long as this doubt is present.

 

The law doesn't work that way. He is guilty of many crimes that comes with his confessions.

This has no excuse for in the court.

 

Truth doesn't change. My words have been constant since the beginning.

It is this person, who constantly contradicts and improvises as he confesses when only cornered.

 

Repeating offense when lethal intent is revealed, when dangers are present for the victim,

he cannot be allowed to 'stay'.

 

This is not a matter of perjury or theft. It is about crimes of aiming for destruction on to a person's life.

What is at stake is to the people involved because it creates chaos, and yet it chooses to repeat its offense, despite being caught, in repeat.

 

What is wrong would be the court to keep allowing it. Fronting ambiguity while its intent was discovered.

His crimes must be charged for.

 

 

--------------

 

Please differentiate what is tolerable as an competitive act,

and what is blatant, lethal crimes by framing.

 

 

This court does not differentiate this at the heart.

 

Steve is guilty.