This "case by case" analysis, despite all the lies that is caught,

I do not understand.

 

What leaves as ambiguity, is but then becomes exploitation,

 

as you already know its repeating offense and its intent.

 

Only concrete evidence can allow it that case, whatever it is.

 

But it won't exist. Only ambiguities and doubt.

 

And that does not lopside things to its advantage.

 

No way.

 

Not after all the things it has done.

 

And showing no intent to stop.

 

It's a lunatic. A maniac.

 

I hope you can see that.

 

The court must base on its repeating offense. Not ambiguity.