"why god can't kill satan"

 

I guess laura is different from steve and his brother.

she's not commited hate crimes or framing of physical violence.

 

however, stating i was involved in a love triangle,

and by the number of theft.

and pursuit thereof...

 

knowing the stakes of life and death.

 

it may still be the same.

 

i won't push for capital punishment on her.

but the authorities will know what will be appropriate.

 

she has no conscience either,

knowing what these brothers have done and joining in.

 

 

my opinion is that her fate is already written,

as she goes on pursuit, unending.

 

 

 

---------

stallone keeps saying "first blood".

exposure of a crime unaddressed, based on the existing deeds.

and asking capital punishment by assessment of what it has done,

you leave the control over to the law.

hate crimes + additional crimes on pursuit.

I believe, if i'm not wrong, revival of theft was present then from the first confession.

 

even if not,

like i mentioned.

framing is taking total control by themselves.

total control over the law by distorting reality of the victim,

by assigning deeds that does not exist, knowing the stakes and the situation.

this is attempted murder. it is not based on existing deeds but creations.

few ambiguity does not alleviate them of pursuit of lethal, devastating harm.

 

furthermore,

number of times of attacks, scale of the attacks and unending.

pursuit thereof.

this dismantles any argument others are making to save them.

it means they are on promotion of harm.

that their harm on to me is permissible.

tortured and enduring, for life, as they are parasitic.

they the supporters of them should remain neutral as observers of crime.

 

scale of theft is not about perjury or sake of theft itself.

projected outcome of its 'win' is my death.

this is to obliterate a person's life.

the intent is clear.

 

"fight or fall"

survival isn't excuse for lethality.

distorting reality of victim by ceation of deeds,

is total control over the law,

total intent to murder.

what the law assigns as punishment,

is my self-defense.

 

 

--------

seeing feifei's relay,

"why don't you believe in god?"

with an answer that says "lack of evidence".

 

hope this isn't about steve and his friends.

 

one would be forcing an excuse to let them go,

if you are.

 

what is impossible is impossible.

it is not an matter of opinion unless you force an imagination.

 

empirical evidence, is evidence.

to deny this would be wrong.

 

apologies for strong statements.

i must for my self-defense.

 

you don't let creation of unreasonable, forced doubt win.

at the favor of ambiguity, when you know the logic is clear,

as well as its previous confessions and contradictions, lies caught.

 

this is obstruction of justice based on prejudice.

it is designed to then exploit by your own values.

that is not the court.

that is lopsided to saving my attackers.

 

obviously one of us lying.

there are no indeciveness.

 

a distinction must be made.

an outcome must be.

 

whether you agree with me or not,

do try and hear me out in this statement:

 

"steve is a sick, demented person. it is lethal, evil."

 

from my end.

as the victim.

i KNOW.

it is not an 'opinion'.

 

i hope that one figure that out.

the kind of brutality and malice these people are, led by steve.

 

seeing "forgive" again.

if so.

you are an idiot.

you don't deserve to be there as the authority.

 

the harm towards me not only exists,

but it is on PURSUIT.

you expect me to forgive when dangers are present.

then what are you?

 

you are not there for the law or justice.

you are there to be human and human only by your own doctrine.

then resign, have someone who is capable of making distinctions,

as the law should.

 

apologies if i got that relay wrong.

 

 

"stuck here forever"

 

you are frauds.

who is exploiting this situation.

claiming this is to help me,

as you take away my reality.

 

this is no justice.

 

 

don't even try.

this court proceeds, with an outcome.

that is to address every crime.

with all the rights of a person, intact.

that includes my eventual observation of the court,

as the defendant.

you do not assign unlawful 'protection' by your choice.

 

i have not had my proper defense by observation.

have i.

 

as your decisions change constantly by my statements.

why am i not front in line for my defense?

 

if not to favor my attackers.

do not fucking say this is to protect me.

it's the other way around.

 

and the moment you people again decide to bury me alive.

is the moment,

you are committing a felony.

 

so say it again, you fucking cunts.

do you want to exploit this situation?

take away my rights,

as you see me becoming 'danger' to these people,

by correct assertion of the law.

 

my fair observation of the court for my own defense,

is a given right.

 

i have never had that.

 

so what do you think you are doing?

 

this is obstruction of justice, a fraud,

designed to bully by FRAUD, claiming it is protect the defendant,

as he is disadvantaged from sight for his own defense.

 

this is to protect my attackers instead.

 

 

I apologize if I read the relays wrong.

 

 

But as this repeats,

 

there is no choice but to file for corruption of the authorities.

 

 

What are you implying!!!!!!!!

 

YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT!!!!


DO YOU UNDERSTAND!!!

 

TO BURY ME ALIVE!!!