i think the issue may be...

 

the court is having a hard time stating the difference between,

deterministic evidence based on facts.

that is based on only course of action that must be taken.

(such as that of Steve not listing my ideas as foresight, when it came on to that channel)

 

against,

 

baseless claims based on prejudice and belief.

which is what Biden and Steve is doing together.

it is a propagada than it is evidence.

it is about creating doubt, despite the contradictions.

 

if difficult to express these differences in words, kindly use the computer.

that is what generative A.I is for.

but the situation should be properly informed in the thread.

 

 

and you cannot give biden power over the court.

he is one of the attackers.

i am being fair.

 

 

 

if that baseless nonsense won't identified,

then we have an issue of unending cycle.

 

most everything i say, it is confined within human parameters.

it is the only logical thing.

 

steve tries to deviate away from that with excuses

that is impossible. such as that of memory.

 

it has to be differentiated and someone with a logical mind,

unbiased to anyone's favor, must bring about the outcome.

 

there is no ambiguity. both of us cannot go free.

one is lying through his teeth.

that is not me.

 

you may find doubt that they create now and then.

but it not evidentiary. it will require imagination.

whatever it may be.

 

my logic do not require imagination.

it is the answer.

 

steve is different.