Back from the library.

 

Seeing Michelle's relay here: About a "Sadahiko" stating it will never eat "Yubari melon."

being too expensive. And Pione, another name for it being "black pearl."

"10,000 yen for 2 bunches. Too expensive to buy."

 

1. If this is Steve, who is stating it won't attempt harm again.

But there was no full confession to its previous deeds.

Then it means, this person is on-going in his crimes.

It does not matter if it states it won't target me again for 'sacrifice' is too high.

Then it did not bend its ego. It sustains it, and keeps me on defamation and danger.

This is intentional on-going harm.

And capital punishment, if it was applied before, should sustain itself.

 

2. When I wrote yesterday, if it confesses, it will serve time but get the "rewards".

I do not mean rewards from this competition that is coming from Elon Musk.

I mean the investors. Mr Musk, has invited a criminal whose confessed to theft before,

and supported this criminal reviving itself on theft again. And alongside his own antagonization towards me, I was cornered and subjugated.

To split the rewards towards Steve would be further support of his crimes.

That is intentional and is a felony. It is also dishonorable as a human being.

Investors are a different story. They can risk themselves if they wish to.

But competitive rules should not be mixed with authoritative impunity and encouragement of crime based on personal values. It is conjunction with the law when it is in public.

So Steve, no matter how 'well' he may have done, is out of the competition and its rewards.

Towards the investors, that is fair game by their choice.

Secondly, I also need time to recuperate myself because of these attacks. Mr Musk should be aware that.

 

I hope those 2 points are clear.

1. Protecting itself by stating "it's not worth it" is selfish motivation.
It is NOT a declaration of ending targeted harm.

To cater to this, means obstruction of justice.

When there is no confession, it's unbending ego means on-going harm.

I means my danger remains the same. And its statement is not genuine.
Its intent remains just the same.

2. It never was in the competiton and the rewards that follow. Only the investors whom are

outside of the realm of the competition.

 

 

Apologies to the authorities if I got any of that relay wrong.

But my logic and moral principles are absolutely correct.