Can the authorities please contact? You can confiscate and check into anything I have if you like.

I once bought a paper shredder and got rid of my scribblings.

As I am seeing from Hector's relay something on Einstein and a wastebin,

if you are using this prejudice as a way to subjugate that is wrong.

 

1st. I was under monitoring 24/7 and I am aware of this. What will I be writing on my own papers in that situation, had I done any wrong? Or present something in that monitoring,
or in this situation being in the blind?

 

2. They were legal scribblings, a practice before I present it on screen, and maybe an idea or two that I was conceiving. Both of which are sensitive materials if it got on hands of people digging through the trash can, and decide to claim it for themselves, or use any inconsistencies in the legal scribblings as I am trying to remember the order in the draft.

So it is in my right to get rid of them at the time.

 

3.  Everything i've presented were done instantly whilst i'm watching the screen. When you are monitoring me in my room. They have their triggers (either quora posts, or elon musk's relays, or correlating ideas) and it was devised on the spot.

And improved through trial and errors, on the spot.  And everything before the mentioning triggers, it followed Steve's confession. Which did not contain any claiming theft to neutralize or justify its own actions.

So it would be your prejudice if you are to try and create conflict based on what I got rid of.

 

I will photo and send to you what I have later on. They don't mean anything.

 

Do understand that it's not about what i'm 'hiding'. It's about what i'm presenting,
knowing that, had my ideas been Steve's or anyone else's, that would be suicide.

In all that many ideas, in this duration. Under all situation of monitoring and being blind,

that is an impossibility.

 

 

I have to make these proper arguments because everybody is there ready to latch on to something and use that prejudice to frame me constantly. And that is wrong.

 

I don't have a photographic memory. But it ain't about that either, if even I have a great memory. It's about presenting my own ideas knowing i'd be dead if it was someone else's.
And Steve's claims have been false, following up on my ideas trying to dilute the timeline.

As well as reasons for its speaking to me ideas and claiming it was thwarted by me,
all has been covered as unreasonable and forced accusations since yesterday. I have proven it clearly.

 

And knowing that Steve has only followed up on my work, what must be seen is his own works are a copycat of my principles he is re-using. And applied on other areas.

If so, that must be discredited.