why would a person supposedly knowing that i'm presenting to investors,
and connected,
not verify his ideas through with me, by email or otherwise,
had it existed?
when it states that stan lee relay does it make sense?
discouraging someone's idea?
if about ships.
bottom line would be, will it float or not?
if it does. and one can't thwart that idea.
then it is is a good idea. how can you discourage someone?
no it doesn't make sense.
ah. another evidence.
i am sending to the landlord himself. on my presentation.
another one!
I sent to dr.kleinsek, on my presentation.
he's even commenting on the section 8.
this is before steve moved out. which is july.
and this is feb.
and i am aware my computer is monitored.
and so is steve's.
Another one.
I am writing to Ben.
But since Ben isn't so approval of me,
I am intuitively thinking he won't believe me...
In Ben's defense on gaslighting, if he is.
I guess his situation is same as now.
Under authoritative rules not to contact.
lol. I'm even sending the presentation to the cryonics facility.
i guess my heart is at where my mom's at.
so even as they are strangers, since they were connected to Ben,
I am self-reasoning I should notify them of my prospects...
naive I am. XD
those 4 attachments include,
spherical ship, the presentation, and the space escalator.
From your archive, search for any of my writings regarding the wooden ship
with the keyword "wooden".
you will see that, alongside these few examples i've written to the public,
those many re-usage of my wooden ships, see Steve's stance back then.
either silence in acknowledgement or even support.
It's only after the presentation was hacked and released into the public,
and I am freely sending it to everybody.
Until then, I had a laptop without a wifi card in it, (I took it out)
and started writing there and was being careful not to release the presentation in the
public.
so key points:
please look into Steve's stance from before, as I was writing about the wooden ships.
these were years back.
witnesses will also have things to say about it.
there is no reason why it would, of all times, after many years,
it is now aiming for the wooden ships.
because on its research, it knows that the further it goes back,
the lesser the evidence of its origin.
and it is using the situation but,
you will know that it is lying by its stance, back then.
as well as the confession that followed.
-------------
You will find Steve's misdirection. By its stance back then, and latent timing in which it is claiming this.
Have you looked through Steve's writing? By witnesses? It must have some form of contradiction to its current statement. First confession itself is a dead giveaway.
So I will leve it to the authorities.
If the ship idea really was Steve's, i'd just give it.
If it means I go to jail, for perjury, i'd just give it.
But unfortunately, or fortunately. It really is my idea.
So you can eliminate that i am trying to hide the presentation from steve for nefarious purposes.
as you can see, i'm sending to festus, i'm sendng to the landlord, (who has steve's email and i know it from the first day because he was helping me with e-transfer on the rent)
sending to bunch of people,
but this is after it was hacked and released.
but that's not only the main point.
you must see steve's stance, as i was re-using the wooden ships and mentioning it,
often.
why now, of all times?
sigh........
it's misleading you.
as you can see wooden ships are the main focal point of my sea platform idea.
of which my extended family followed up.
of which steve supported myself against them if i am not wrong.
if i was 'hiding' anything from steve,
why would i be using my wooden ships constantly throughout these years?
even to the moment of the Titanic recovery?
what was its stance then,
as well as many other given points?
it's just ADAPTING, IMPROVISING.
for theft.
the word "wooden" clearly differentiates the metal ships inside the presentation.
and since the beginning, as i try to not cut down trees and make it into metal.
all those iterationsand tries. what was its stance then?
cut off one head, another one appears.
Authorities, you must see how it is.
it's just impossible for me to mislead.