And whatever so-called 'wisdom' it portrays as its character,

see if that correlates to these reasons of dissuasion.

If it has intellect enough to thwart it.

Have enough belief in itself.

 

Any person who is capable of coming up with ideas of my 'level'

also has the power to self-verify it has merit. That it works to an fundamental level.

That is what intellect is.

 

And more it asserts itself with awareness,

the more you should be suspicious of it.

 

Because it simply does not make sense.

 

And of course, if I was trying to show my ideas to someone who holds my fate,

and I presented it to him, because I believe in my ideas,

and this person keeps thwarting it.

 

Would I keep presenting it to this person by however many numbers?

Of course not. I would be suspicious and paranoid in fact.

And catch on quickly that he is not trying to help me.

 

And he was again, aware that the whole house was monitored.

As I am telling everyone about it. But especially him.

So he could write to the audience at any time, or speak through the phone at any time.

 

There is silence because this was pre-meditated.

And so it came on to the channel, and the first thing it did was theft.

Instead focusing on unraveling a crime, had there been.

It only led to its own confession.

 

 

Try and see the situation based on human emotions.

One cannot deviate away from it.

 

I am in no situation to mislead,

and this person is stating the impossible and forcing it on to you.

 

And the idiot supporters are falling for it, in their own imagination and eccentricity.

 

I am not a person who is brazen or thick-skinned. I may have been thick-skinned when my mother died for a while,

but... My natural state is, unable to commit such crimes.

I am not suicidal either.

 

But this person, if you get the idea of this person, and I think the supporters as well,

they are all about "no pain, no gain" type of individuals. Who has unreasonable 'force' in them.

I believe.

 

I am not this. I am not capable of this.

Not then, not in this situation.

 

In fact, a person would have to be crazy and suicidal to be asserting stolen ideas

while he is blind to the channel in this many repeats, as it so claims however many a number.

 

But especially the more complex the idea with key pointers that can overlap.

If it says memory issue, that is a bogus lie. It would have presented it before I.

 

It is always a follow up. And unreasonable force.