Are you to argue, if what is remaining as theft is ambiguous. Wrong. It is not.

But more importantly, it admitted and confessed to attempted stealing a mass amount

of my ideas, which will frame me as a 'origin thief' as people are being convicted of attempted murder. And I would be deserving of that death penalty.

The difference between few and mass a number of theft, is the difference between life and death.

It's confessed, and it continues still.

If one were to try and accuse me of "first blood" for suggesting its capital punishment.
This is based on its deeds and it is up to the law to observe the overall additional to the hate crimes, and add to it. To identify its overall destructive intent, to cause devastation to the victim's life, and charge it for the capital punishment.

But that is absolutely based on its DEEDS. Facts. What is done.

FRAMING. Is a completely different animal. It is gaslighting. It has no limiter and the law has to obey by what it CREATES. It is complete INTENT of control to KILL. There are no factors in which it is submitting that control over TO the law.

And when it framed me for physical harm. Saying i've beaten it up. Say that was a 'stalemate'
in which that so-called "first blood" was countered by its framing. (Though both are NOT equal)

But say that it is.

What CONTINUED thereafter is that confession of attempting to steal by the mass.

Framing me as a 'origin thief' as chaos ensues, as people are charged with the death penalty.

And that was repeating offense, that would not stop without conscience.

As the death penalty was insinuated on to me.

 

So how does it get away from the capital punishment?

 

I have the right for self-defense. I have the right for my future as the victim. It is not up to the law's say. This is accurate.

 

Please consider my rights, my future.

 

It may lose its merit as I repeat a thousand times, but I will say it again.

This is a heinous person, who is lethal. Aiming for devastation and destruction on to a person's life.

 

 

Same thing with more quotes from the law.

 

 

Problem is that you are simply dismissing his crimes as fraud.

When dangers were clearly present and will continue to be present.

That's not fair for the victim, is it?

To be enduring endless harm?

 

When the situation is about life and death. When the outcome assigned

in the entirety of this environment and by its ripple effect of damage,

means life and death.

It's attempts are no mere 'fraud'.

It is destruction, it is attempted murder.

And the law must adhere to its actions, in conjunction with the situation at hand.

What you are doing is lopsiding, and isolating its actions to itself. Without the projected outcome of its harm.

So you are terribly being lenient on this person.

That is exploitation of technicality. No. It wasn't mere 'fraud'. Let's make that clear.

 

It's also not only me, but many were charged of the death penalty because of its misleads,

and it continues. "Extreme indifference to human life" is definitive.

 

 

----------

Unrelated, as for Dan's relay on Sean Kernan's latest post. And few others.

Fucking demented fuck. On Denise Richards. "On playing the same person in every movie" (and other sick things it is saying XD)

on my yesterday, speaking out on them with the same dialogue. It has to be the same,

as I am basing this on their deeds.

 

It's this attitude, it has. Remorseless.

But again, why do you dismiss their framing as if it were nothing?

Even after I dropped charges on their first attack, they continued.

And relentlessly I was framed.

 

Why do you dismiss my rights?

I apologize if i'm wrong about this.

 

It's I think you. Authorities, don't look into the entirety of the past,

and just dismiss the seriousness of it all.

 

Their framing is intended harm. Why is that dismissed?

 

I'm not being bloodthirsty here. I would go against capital punishment if I have a choice.

Even as this fucker boils my blood. And the rest.

 

But their intended harm, it must be accounted for. It should be 20+ in prison.
For all of them.

 

Order goes like this.

I reject Anna. She attacks, while in Becky's home. And they were in it together.
Becky warning me few days earlier I believe.

I drop charges on the hack and spamming for my humiliation.

They conspire together to enter the cryonics facility to harm my mother, based on the info

they have. I believe there was a chat dialogue to all this.

They were given capital punishment, I try to save them by reducing to 10 years in prison.

Loophole of the law begins by Biden's assertion.

Whenever they were convicted, new judges came about.

And the framing towards me, begin. Instead repenting for their actions,

they attack me relentlessly. And by arguments that isn't acceptable for their actions.

They meant tangible harm. Physical harm. Devastation. Not as a passing joke, but lasting.
To cripple the person. Do you agree with this? Or would you dismiss it as humor?

And the framing went on as death penalty I believe was insinuated on to me.

And even after all that, as their death penalty came, I tried to diminish it again.

And what is happening? You are letting them go?

Are you insane? (I apologize if i'm getting the relays wrong on their lenience)

Differentiate whatever I have done to their tangible harm.

What possible harm can I do in this situation, as a stranger, in distance, when they

haven't even seen my face back then? My jokes or reactions are merely WORDS.

And they acted in hatred aiming for devastation. It was a targeted HUNT.

Please do not alleviate them of imprisonment that should be for a very long time.

 

They seen my face as they hacked, but that wasn't consensual was it?

I remained a stranger, I remained in distance. They stalked, they hunted.

And I merely joked and apologized and cared for their being.

Their actions were by their own temper, by their own values, by their own choices.

And devastating harm at that.

And even as I drop charges.

What in the hell?

And the continued framing thereafter, as I am in devastating trouble.

And this is not cared for?

 

 

-----------

Again, I have no idea what is going on. It just seems like they were alleviated from punishment. So I am mentioning.

 

Steve is deserving of capital punishment. This person was beyond lethal.

Anna and the gang, Sean and the gang, whom are together, can pose no serious harm at this point. This is why their capital punishment need not be.

However. What they attempted prior must be present.

 

 

 

I am being fair. And by the law as well.

 

Kindly, just because I am alone and uneducated in these matters of the law,

doesn't mean my commonsense is wrong.

 

I react by the dangers perceived then and the now.

And so should the law.

 

-----------

If anyone is missing the point, on steve.
It is about what it has ALREADY DONE.

And the intent of its lethal actions.

What it is doing now, can be overruled by the court,
in its absolute fairness, that it is continued intent to harm.

 

I would advocate for peace, as much as I can.

But with this person, which is the embodiment of lethal chaos.

Lenience is unacceptable.

 

I know it takes a while to read all that, alongside GPT answers.

But please. It has to be taken seriously.

Its actions cannot be taken as a mere fraud.

The stakes were life and death in ths environment,

and that must count. Its attempt to obliterate my life.

By the sheer number of what it was trying to steal.

By taking my identity as well in its prejudice and mockery and claiming its sovereignity as it knows it is harm. As it comes from a place of violence fronting its brother, as it mugs.

As people are being charged for the death penalty, persuaded by this person.

You've seen indifference to the welfare of all. Only what it feigns as it continues harm.

No. This was not merely fraud.

It was about obliteration.

It must be charged for capital punishment.