--------

Another reasoning.

 

People won't engage into a crime, that they are trying to incriminate a person with.

The penalty would fall back on them, and they know this.

 

Why would they risk themselves of a same crime, if it was trying to uncover a crime?

 

This is the reason: It was trying to GROW it after the first confession, so to turn the table around.

Bigger mess = more dilution. Instead going the other direction, which is to confess and repent.

It decided to go full out.

 

Remember that the moment it appeared on the channel is the moment it would have asserted its own ideas, since day 1.

IF there was any crimes to uncover.

Instead, it ended up in confession. And stood silent for a long time, until it saw an opportune moment.

*Which is the lack of timestamps and people using the situation the same way.

Noticing their exploitation.

 

What happened was, it did everything in its vanity.

And tried turning the table around by not repenting,

instead going the opposite direction.

 

Which is making it into a bigger framing than before.

Bigger chaos. All or nothing.

 

I hope you see what I am talking about.

 

 

 

As it saw the judges change, and people framing me again and again,

everything to their favor.

And even support it was getting.

It decided to revive itself from its previous crimes.

 

Self-justifying to the law, its way into these crimes.

 

For it,

if it gets caught, another excuse.

if it doesn't, there leaves ambiguity, which can work to its advantage.

 

And hence, why the law must set an limiter to its actions.

You have no reason to trust it.

 

And, it should be apprehended. The victim, should not be suffering, enduring,

 because of this person.