Please see that what Anna did, which is my humiliation by cyberbullying was AMPLIFIED in public display.

by Biden. And what Sean did, which is attacking my mother passively by entering the facility by first threats and abuse then attempted, was AMPLIFIED by Biden.

Followin the same pattern, fully aware in recognition.

 

You must understand Biden's fucked up character of cruelty.

And this must be charged for, all this unreasonable FORCE.

---------

I could be wrong on this assumption, but if Zuckerberg antagonizes me in any possible way,

after Adam. Supporting my attackers, see his contradictions from prior and do not trust him.

He has his own issues of seeing this as a 'political espionage' in exploitation, in justification of that. He may have expressed this before. As if "us" against "them".

But I was a civilian who was attacked by the powerful and deceitful. That is all.

I apologize to Zuckerberg if my speculation is wrong that you are antagonizing.

But I am writing just in case. My intuition tells me differently.

 

 

-------

As for Obama, earlier i've seen relays where he was antagonizing me.

If he is.

I don't think whatever he says is in alignment to his appearance and attendance by the timeline.

They appeared later, to whatever they are defending my attackers from.

Presumably for political advantage.

And the excuses he is making if he is,

is against very foundations of human rights.

This I believe is for his own survival and his network.

 

Unfortunately, what I am saying is absolutely correct.

 

--------

My suspicion is that they are gaslighting as a group.

And when you see other witnesses saying differently,

or they, contracdicted themselves from prior statements,

(witnesses must speak out on this)

you will know their intent.

 

I am speaking from intuition. But as they are cornered,

I get the feeling that they are trying to bury the past of whats happened

and distort it by gaslighting.

Please look into this.

 

----------

I can only tell you the truth of the events, being in the blind like this, and isolated.

But involved in these events, with interaction with Mr Musk and others.

Knowing these events exist.

 

So if they are gaslighting as if not. Or diluting the origins to their advantage somehow.

Or timeline somehow. There are people who will state otherwise.

 

-----------

The fact that... people rely on who becomes a president to alleviate themselves

of their charges...

When in fact, there are no justifications. Nor should any president have the power to pardon,

under inexcusable and unreasonable reasons of a political espionage,

 

when that is against a helpless civilian. In a country where we are allies.

 

Where adversary and enemy should have been clearly defined.

And competition and war should have been clearly defined.

 

But through exploitation, greed, they escalated the situation to where it should not have been.

That is the people of the government back then,

who supposedly had the power to not inititate,

to had the power to stop it in the process of their mistake,

and not to cross the line in their deeds...

 

 

And while, each individual is responsible for their own actions,

and their personal motives different,

 

certainly the environment was set.

 

And if the upcoming president, whoever it will be,

tries to free them...

There we will see exploitation of the law.

 

And the cycle will end at the end of the presidency,

when the power is diminished and this court will be revived.

 

So... Please do not intervene, leave it to the current court,

which is the correct court.

 

There is a reason why the judicial branches are separated in the States.

When one line of power is exploiting, the other must prevent it from persisting.

 

One cannot try and create a cycle, when this court exists by reaction of what they've done.

 

--------

And no, you don't try and alleviate their capital punishment into something else,

by reading this message. Trying to turn it into their favor as an political espionage.

 

Again. This is against a civilian, and their motives, personal. For personal gain.

And while recognizing it is lethal, what they are doing.

 

Not that i'm bloodthirsty. But dismissing anyone of capital crimes = full confession,

remorse for what they've done, and no chance of repeating themselves.

 

But they justify their actions after confessions, and they continue to frame.

 

 

Further, politicians also attacked a civilian. Who was ALREADY under control.

ALREADY helpless. And asserted harm, that is unforgivable.

That is exploitation of power.

 

So this goes into the realm of personal crimes.

There are no political justifications.

 

All that throne and what not, came much later.

And I am not in the position to be targeted as a civilian.

 

As a civilian, because we recognize 1 civilian is weak against a group, that is yourselves.

One must give as much rights as possible, for a fair observation and fair fight.

That is why rights exist in the first place.

 

Once under surveillance, you already have this person in your jurisdiction.

So whatever, however the prejudice, you MUST give this person as much rights he is given

by default.

And yet,

they made the vulnerable more vulnerable,

they made the weak, even weaker,

until he was immobile, subjugated.

 

And then they started exploiting, they started attacking a singular individual.

 

This is unacceptable. Each and every individual must count for their motives and charges.

Nobody is together as a whole, and cannot be dismissed of their charges as a whole.

Every person is DIFFERENT.

 

----------

"Obi-wan has PTSD"

 

hahaha my cousin Mark has PTSD.

 

I get it.

 

I think I should have been gone mad and insane,

if I was someone else.

 

 

See these people have my extended family and everyone I know involved as well.

 

And what does that spell out?

 

 

That I am indeed a civilian.

 

Didn't they try to frame me as a spy?

 

Whatever spies do, I don't even know.

 

So this, all this?

 

Their insanity. And, as much as I would like to forgive, and I have tried per person.

As you already know.

 

It is up to you, the law, to decide on their punishment.

And unfortunately, that probably isn't good for them.