"because no one memed the time it happened" - vegeta.

 

again. go through each of the ideas steve is claiming theft.

it means that there was a prominent reason for persuasion, to deter this person away from his own ideas.

 

no such discussion was held.

 

so when it gives out an excuse:

 

1. See if he is capable of thwarting this conflict, a creation of doubt, with his own intellect.

I am certain he is. Had it existed.

 

2. See the numbers in which it claims it was continuously thwarted, why will it continue,

if those 'reasons' would obviously be a mislead?

 

 

It would not make sense.

 

Every idea is mine. Simply. I'd give anyone credit if otherwise.

 

Please see what kind of terrible/heinous person this is.

 

 

you will now know for sure this fucker is lying through its teeth.

 

 

so ask it what the reason was per idea. (1)

see if it is capable of thwarting this reason, had it ben its own idea. (2)

and see if at least few were thwarted, things that would perfectly make sense to be on pursuit and defend on its own, why it would continue 'showing' me another idea. (3)

 

there was no such discussion held. end of story.

nobody can thwart another person of an idea when it is fundamentally working.

that is part of his intellect. why one would come up with it in the first place with self-validation. because it is a capable idea.

 

and why would i be the abjucator of his intellect, telling him why and why not?

what would give me that right? i am whole lot younger than he. (4)

 

it doesn't make any sense.

 

and i am telling him we are being monitored. why would he not present himself through his own channel? computer or phone?  (5)

 

why will it, the moment it came on to that platform, it started stealing MY IDEAS and confessed, without mentioning theft from myself as its defense after all that time, had ANY ideas been his? (6)

 

do you see how people are FORCING themselves to support this person, after all the endless deceit?