you stand on foundation of repeating behavior,

repeating offense. your intent is figured out.

persuading people by force,

as with your supporters is your wishful thinking.

it will always go back to your defeat.

 

 

Keep seeing the (St)an Lee relay.

"Don't let idiots talk to you out of an idea."


This never happened.

 

It asserts impossible things. Impossible.

See my reasoning from before.

 

Knowing investor connection, had it truly believed in investors,

had it asserted any ideas, it would confirm with me,

it would confirm the moment it got on there,

it never would assert an idea unless it first believed in the idea,

no ideas of mine can be thwarted by convincing or deviating from laws of physics,

it would have merit one way or another.

and that was no situation to truly believe in an investor association.

I don't have enough proof. I don't have access to the channel.

that is why you see me talking about how MY investment amount is large,

trying to convince it saying, "I know it is an unbelievable amount"

just before it moves out. Simultaneously stating its own path.

You can argue on the semantics, why would I be convincing it, if it had truly believed in investors?

Why would it assert ideas and leave the house? Because I persuaded it out of it?

I don't think so.

Why would it be trying to steal MY ideas and lead to confession since day 1?

Why wouldn't it be focused on ideas stolen?

Why wouldn't that confession state those ideas?

 

This is insanity. It should have ended the moment it confessed the first time.

What it creates is doubt. Using the only fact that it was physically beside me.

And the timing of whatever it is trying to assert, doesn't make sense.

But people deliberately forget that, in order to front him.

The supporters are people who are in trouble by the law, aren't they?

Steve that scammer is the savior for them.

 

 

Look into the flow of the emails. There is a reason why this fucker is keeping

silent all the time. It was aiming to create doubt later on.

It was asking me the origins of my ideas as it was reading my presentation.

This was premeditated, as it has proven with its brother.

 

What is insane is, this is permitted AFTER it has confessed.

 

And that confession isn't dissected enough.

That understanding between the authorities then, and Steve confessing,

confession which must be in its entirety after all that it has done,

isn't understood clearly.

 

Meaning, whatever is the missing information now,

isn't being connected to Steve's comments and statements made back then.

The two must be combined to see his intent in the now.

 

And just how many ideas is this fucker and Laura stating is theirs?

Is that even possible?

why would lies, framing be existing, if it was trying to uncover a crime?

 

is my situation being in the blind, can i possibly assert someone else's idea?

 

NO. What it asserts is FORCE.

 

Please look into its comments made since day 1.

 

So many reasons, so many violations this person has made on intellectual property.

And why would you give it credit?

Why would you give it further chance?

 

Because it found some flair in generating ideas?

 

What is his is his,

 

what is MINE IS MINE.

 

it's that simple. But this fucker, violates into my life and tries ABSORBING my ideas

as it it were his.

 

THERE is the problem. It is trying to dissolve its crimes by SUBJUGATION.

 

it's the same tactic, all of it.

 

all about subjugating a person by creation of doubt.

 

evil fuck.

 

and I do not have a photographic memory.

How could I possibly remember all that details unless i'm coming up with it myself?

and stating by what triggers?

 

when that didn't work out,

it's going back to times before *when the theft began, where i wasn't as careful in stating the triggers isn't it?

it's to dilute the origins.

 

I was being careful to state the triggers as I went on.

 

Please see to its statements when I first mentioned about it reading the presentation

and asking me about the origins of my ideas. Did it admit to this before?

Does anyone remember?

 

 

 

When you research into the past, and its statements and acknowledgement then.

That is the key to this investigation.

 

There is no reason for it to CONFESS.

 

Nor STEAL.

 

Since the beginning, had there been ideas stolen from me.

 

So that is what you must focus on. Its stance then.

 

Where are the  records?

 

 

and in all cases,

timing is ME.

 

I came up with it before it.

 

in this insane setting where i am blind and cnanot take no such risks.

had it not been mine.

 

so its forcing itself,

 

and what i can't believe is the stupidity of people,

 

despite seeing its intent in the open, repeating itself,

and AS IT CONFESSES.

 

what is wrong with the law?

since the beginning.

 

it's like eveyrone wants me to be destroyed. no matter what.

 

 

 

 

repeating intent, repeating offense,

is PURSUIT.

by timing, of when this thing is going after it.

and by the confession.

IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.

AFTER YEARS.

 

Look into what it did. Where are the archived records?

 

People are swayed by the surface level reasoning!

 

This is not how the law works.

 

When you see repeating offense, you don't give it more chances for adaptation.

 

And yet, it persists because you choose not to refine.

 

Why is that.

 

Why am I the victim?

 

Because too many people did wrong.

And I can easily become a sacrifice in order to save them.

 

But justice is justice.

 

Criminal is criminal.

And you have already uncovered that criminal, that is Steve.