And by the way,

since when I did rely on my scribblings to come up with ideas?

Everything was done while staring at the screen.

By the triggers, or by the trial and error process, or by the enhancements,

you can clearly see it progresses.

If to argue this was done in my "photographic" memory.

I don't have a photographic memory. A good memory, perhaps.

And each of that so-called 'memory' is actually a trap I would be willingly falling into.

Knowing that I cannot see the channel, and every detail I write is a chance for someone to overlap with their previous writing.

Had it existed.

 

 

Do you see how it is completely bogus prejudice you are asserting?

 

 

 

 

And even without this, the law is clearly aware, through their repeating attempts and even confessions of malice. That these people want to deter my path, 'destiny', if you will.

And that is the goal. Political, individual, they all have targeted me.

And with that intent spoken and actions and deeds done prior.

 

The law has the right to dismiss anything they say at this point.

But especially prejudice.

 

Bottom line is, I should be given my fair rights as an individual, as a HUMAN BEING.

NO MATTER WHAT.

IN THIS COURT.