Oh big thing. I think everyone forgot.


While i'm sure the authorities know by now, Steve aimed for destruction. Not perjury.

And if few or 1 is remaining as doubt. This doesn't alleviate him of his capital punishment.

 

I have written about this before. But people forgot by now.

 

Hate crime fronting violence to subjugate a person, installation of fear. To mug. (1)

and assigning an identity with its prejudice, for years, confirming those actions were from prejudice. And exploitation of that prejudice with violence. (2)


And attempting to frame me by stating i've caused it physical injury, by violence. Which results in diluting the origins, hence I am framing HIM.

Suggesting to the mediator that is the law, if capital punishment can be applied by exposing its crimes. Until to that point, it wasn't recognized as a hate crime. People simply dismissed it as if it were nothing.

And while capital punishment is often associated with attempted murder with the hate crime. It was up to the authorities to see if its additional crimes which continued relentlessly since then was eligible for death penalty.

Only humans can judge that clearly, seeing its relentless harm.

I believe my request was turned down. Having exposed its crimes, and leaving it to the authorities to decide. As up to that point, life and death may not have been a question.

(Note that violence "gay bashing", is no ordinary violence. It is a senseless brutal one.
One that is aimed at a person's identity. To subjugate.

And it went it on pursuit, without remorse, justifying its way on its prejudice. So it was justifying the violence as well.)

And it was on relentless pursuit of harm then, as it is now.

 

So where is the turning point from that 'forgiveness'?

AFTER it framed me for causing physical injury.
You understood its heinous intent. BY FRAMING.

If it was fairness by the law, by what person has done, by facts of deeds. Then not.

Then no matter what anyone says, there is the written law and the judges to decide on the outcome.

But by FRAMING, this individual tried taking my life.

 

This is what solidified its punishment, capital punishment.

It was OVER then.

 

But SOMEHOW people diluted this with its continued attempts at framing by intellectual property.

As if its continued attempts will diminish what it did. If it can find a loophole.

 

Here is the thing:

Its continued attempts at framing. By intellectual property. DOES NOT JUSTIFY ITS LETHAL ACTIONS. EVEN IF HAD ANY, been stolen.

(None were, however even if few or 1 were stolen or even all of which it suggested earlier, however many, was stolen. It would not justify its crimes. Hate crimes alongside framing by violence, when since the moment it came online is the moment it would have focused on the theft. But it didn't. Because there was none. It would not lead to confession of its OWN wrongdoing, after 400+ days. )

THE FRAMING was NOT about perjury,

It was framing about its own origins.

This person's origins. That would mean I am trying to kill  by FRAMING.

 

It later confessed partially. That is confession to attempted murder again. This confession happened ONLY after it was cornered.

So besides the above, this even further solidifies its intent to kill.

 

Am I being fair in this? The situation was life and death. Not perjury.

 

And even if at this point, 1 or few is in doubt. Which shouldn't be.

THIS DOES NOT ALLEVIATE HIM OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.

 

It was RELENTLESSLY, ENDLESSLY ATTEMPTING TO TAKE MY LIFE.

 

 

So order goes like this:

1. Hate crime + violence + subjugation + mugging.
2. Justification of that prejudice with no remorse for its actions.
3. Framing by stating that i've caused physical damage. Knowing the outcome.
4. Framing by further theft of intellectual property. Partially confessed, but that is enough
for admitting to attempted murder after 1-3.
5. It proceeds STILL. If it was full confession, it can be let go, but it wasn't. Hence that fundamental point of capital punishment. Which is 1-3. And now, 1-4.

Must be applied.

It doesn't matter if #5 is in doubt.
One or few if perjury, is perjury. I've taken NOTHING as I have spoken the details since the house.

But I am stating, it doesn't matter. It tried to kill me in lethal ways. RELENTLESSLY.

 

 

 

I am hoping you can see my argument authorities.

Each time it did these things, along with confirmation on how.

With its recent partial confession. But relentlessly unending.

Even though the capital punishment should be clear after it was framing me for bodily harm.

It only solidified further. On why capital punishment was necessary.

 

So I don't understand when you are seeking on the surface level of what is happening in the now.

He has a long, relentless history of lethal harm. And this is only persisting.

It absolutely deserves the capital punishment.

I am against these sort of punishment for most. Even my enemies.

But this person isn't it.

 

This person is the worst of the worst of all my foes.

It create doubt using the only fact that it was physically in proximity to me.

And its MANY framing, lethal framing. Has been figured out.

This person is lethal. And it is relentless.

Why can't you see this?

It's not a game of intellectual property. It never was.

It is about destroying a person's LIFE and going at it, NO MATTER WHAT.

 

Fact: turning point, where it became a game of life and death was when it framed me for

bodily harm. And knowing the stakes, it aimed for DESTRUCTION (not perjury) of the origins

of my ideas. By MANY. In its vanity. Which would inevitably lead to my capital punishment.
Because I am misleading and framing the origins of everything. Including as I recognize,
this person's capital punishment, and others as well.

When it confessed, partially, that it did these follow ups. It was a mislead.
This is called attempted MURDER.

And AFTER that confession, it still went on pursuit. Only to be caught continuously.

This is called further attempted murder.

Do you see my argument?

 

And how do you dismiss this as something about intellectual property, as my death penalty

was assigned before several times because of this person's efforts?

 

It is the same stakes, and yet you give him lenience. Why is this?

 

No. He should be in for capital punishment, which is solidified. ABSOLUTELY.

It its endless attempts. And confessed. And caught.

There no longer is any justification. Please recognize this.

 

It is as if people don't see the overview of everything that's happened,

and suddenly sees things from a surface level, and it's just a game of intellectual property.

You forget.

 

No. It was not simple about perjury. This was about this person's aim to destroy my life.

In many ways, including misusage of the law. To literally destroy, take my life.

It was attempted murder. And MANY times. However many times it attempted.

 

No. He cannot be let go of capital punishment.

 

Not my ego talking. Not speaking solely from hatred, blinded by it.

This is logic.

 

 

Asked 8 people. Mostly from this floor.

One should send them the links if they don't really have it.

And see if they send it to me.

 

'cause they said. They'll send it if they receive it. Most of them I think....

 

 

--------

3 Goals I have, short-term.

1. Get what I need and sign up for gym.

2. Work again. Generate ideas. But I am not sure if this is the proper time. I would obviously be feeding the thieves and creating more controversies. If that is still okay.

3. Try and get into that channel. Or if this is the first thing I should be trying to before working. Just in case there are accidental overlaps of what is existing. I can never see.
And I may cover so many industries, chances increase, as their intent remains the same.

*Appointment with social caseworkers next month.


So that is the general idea of it.

 

But because I said this, I feel that you will deliberately extend the time again, to my contact.

I don't know.

They should have been refined, I should have been contacted since long ago, I believe.

Why my rights are suppressed? No fairness in the court?

I don't understand.

 

My 'wishes' are as follows:

1. That Steve is hastened into jailing and punishment.

2. That I am brought into the channel, with a designated person whose been to that channel from this building to contact me directly. And provide immunity from harm for this person.

 

That is it.  I can work without its attempts to take my life by subjugation, by framing.

 

I think most people there are not rational. Irrational, and thinking in an irrational way.

I hope there will be enough clarity to discard their opinions and refine.

Many are toxic.