------------

Unrelated.

 

Correction on my description of Steve from few messages ago.

It is NOT DELUSIONAL.

 

It is DELIBERATE.

 

It is MALICE. KNOWING IT IS STEALING.

 

IT IS DOING SO, in its GRIT and VANITY, AND EVIL.

 

 

And the court has the right to overrule its infinite on-going deceits and framing.

 

I have the right to not to endure this.

 

You have the right to dismiss it now. How many times is it repeating this framing?

When it is cornered, and ONLY when it is cornered, it confesses partially, and tries again.

 

And is that right for the court to accept? As it confesses, it tries at least once more.

Then the court has the absolute right to overrule, knowing its intent.

And mocking, manipulating the court itself. In ALL that duration. As people are misled.

Why do you believe it has respect for the court?

 

Please do not let it be on that channel. It should be in a holding cell.

 

 

If it wants to defend itself from there, then so be it.

 

Difference then would be there would be no chances of making things worse with deceit as it attempted before.

 

By allowing it to roam free, you are allowing infinite number of tries through resources, such

as that of the channel itself and observing everything in there and trying to deceive somehow,

building up on things as a follow up, and stating it is his, as if it was from the past,

 

It always has, since the very beginning, only intent to steal. Mug.

Had any of it been his, that is the first thing it would have asserted, instead the 400+ days it focused on stealing my ideas only to confess.

 

Why people don't get that fundamental fact and give it infinite chances, I do not understand.

 

What is fair is that this person be segregated and be left to his memory.

Not to create new content to deceive by access to new resources. Am I fair in this?

 

 

 

And by not doing that, you are giving it infinite chances.

Am I fair in this?

 

The hilarious thing is that the victim is constantly monitored, 24/7.

As the attackers are not so... As they repeat infinite attacks.

 

What is fair, is that you segregate this person in a holding cell.

You should not be giving it chances to create new content.

It is only a follow up first of all, otherwise there would have been controversies.

And it's confessed already the 2nd time did it not?

That it was following up on my work?

So why do you believe there is anything that is a 'leftover'?

 

Don't you think if there were anything taken from him,

I would have to confess from where I am at?

Because I have no clue, how that information can be overlapped and all?

 

When you measure the give and take, you will know that all this is just impossible deceit and force from Steve. Please don't just see things in a surface level and look further into the situational logic as i've described before.

Unless I am deviating away from fundamental human nature, that is based on fears.

Anyone, everyone normal would have those fears in this situation.

I cannot possibly even hope to mislead anything.

 

So this person is... worst of the worst.

Please do try and look back on all it has done since the beginning and do not give it more chances.

 

I get that you even care for the court of the public opinion.

But some of them are idiots really.

After all that. No way. Not unless they forcing themselves.

 

 

No... i'm sure they were monitored to an extent as well.

but not to my extent. As in, everywhere it goes. So not very fair, is it?

 

 

 

 

I think the correct method is for this person to be segregated much like I,

and given exactly what is on the channel so it makes so-called 'defense' from its memory,

which would be a mislead.

 

In its constant adaptation and improvisation, by observing and manipulating the environment,

it repeats.

 

 

------------

Ok. That is enough of that for now. I will leave it to you.

Apologies for the 'nagging'. I am very frustrated.