ah dun dun ppl.

what you blaming me for?

 

wake up. whatev

er it is.

 

------------

ah. i get it now.

seeing sisko warning worf.

"pre-meditated murder" the context is about.

 

you got it wrong.

i'm not backing out on my word.

 

it still doesn't repent and leaves a leeway, permissible portal into abuse.

that is by assigning my identity at the time of writing,

which was few hours ago,

and apparently even after confession it keeps coming back.

 

then what is the point of confession if the harm proceeds?

 

if it sounded like pre-meditation, (which wasn't)

within few hours, i've stated my fair stance with organization.

 

added, spell correction...:

the difference between criminals and people who momentarily speak out from passion or flawed logic,

is in its duration of pursuit.

and repeating behavior.

*unwilling to bend their ego despite many chances.

that is willing harm. not justice or reason.

 

 

so here is my question for you.

based on that, you are stating you want to say this was pre-meditated murder?

 

what?

 

pre-meditated and pre-emptive have two different meaning.

you talk as if i started this, when this is before a mediator that is the law.

 

no matter what i suggest (which are facts based on their deeds, not framing)

it is up to your decision.

 

so what is YOUR intent?

 

are you so lost in control and adrenalin that you no longer see the difference between passion as reaction and intended crimes?

 

apologies if i am getting these relays wrong.

 

don't be rash.

 

 

 

 

i have no idea what is going on. i just see weird relays.

apologies to the authorities or whomever.

if it didn't happen.

 

if it did. the logic has always been clear.