Ok. Getting angry here. Annoyed.

 

Here are the facts:

 

1. As you can see by the emails, talks of the phone and computer screen being monitored is going on. Meaning, had I taken an idea from Steve, I would leave an unknown factor being in the blind. (He can speak to his friends at will)

Meaning. It is EXACTLY same as this situation. I cannot present something as mine, had it been his, fearing an overlap or complications by the monitoring.

2. Those emails, should have been the determining factor. seeing from beginning to end what is going on. But somehow you are buying into his narratives. That shouldn't be. There are no ambiguation in semantics. It's clear as day when you read the whole thing.

3.  Ask Festus if the presentation I gave him matches the presentation I am showing you. That is the only copy. Ask him if the content is exactly the same, if it included that first paragragh in pg. 27, segment 8, was present when I gave him the digital copy, which was during the times Steve was present in the house. Of course I am.

4. You can see his inconsistences, throughout, the monent he came online to the moment of confession. Which is over 400+ days. And I am re-using my ship idea, as it is, as the wooden ships, and the presentation over and over again.

Had the ships or the presentation been his idea, (of which it was caught by the way, lying about the presentation. It was triggered by Adam's relay. Of which then it means, it is lying about the ships as well.) obviously there would not be an confession without mentioning this.

 

You have the my unknown factor of danger. Hence my motivation is dismissed.  (1)

You have the tangible evidence on the process, of which the fishing boats are clearly mentioned. There is the timestamp to this on the emails. There are the timestamps on my blog prior to this, talking about the ships and its usage. (Refer back to my documents sent to Festus) And there are the timestamps that was sent to Adam during the build. (2)

You have further lack of any harmful malice from myself, knowing that I am sending the presentation as it is, to Festus, who is a close acquaintance of his. While Steve was present in the house. Which was May, 2021. Seeing the emails. And Steve had moven out on July, 2 months after. (3)

 

And you have further evidences of the situation at hand with its confession. And endless repeating lies. Why is he walking around still? He should be in a holding cell and waiting on for his punishment really. Why must I endure this? Why would there be lies at all, had there been even 1 truth to uncover? The court has more than enough to dismiss its creation of endless doubt. Biden is one in the same. It just continues leveraging on people like this.

But the authorities, you must be better than that.

 

 

---------

So as you can see, I gave Festus the copy of the presentation in May. Which was 2 months prior to Steve moving to a new house.

Which is done in trust. They can always share the presentation at will.

 

 

----------

Whatever Steve is saying is complete lie. The house was heavily being monitored, by the phone, screen, and even the cameras. And we were clearly aware of this.

 

I would advise you to confess, fully. Steve.

Slightly hoping you'll refute confession, so you will end up with the capital punishment.

 

As that is declaration of a personal war, and you will persist so as long as you exist.

 

What the fuck is wrong with you?

 

There are enemies you may feel worthy of attacking in this lowest of ways you've met in the past.

That isn't me.

 

But if you are set out to die. Then so be it.

 

 

 

---------

If ever in doubt, please refer back to the emails again,

and please understand that, it is exactly the same situation as now.

 

I cannot present someone else's idea, fearing an overlap.

Within the house, or out. There could be records of conversations, between its friends, anything. And certainly, within the house was LIVE form of danger, if spoken through the phone, on-screen, anything as well.  (1)

So it is completely impossible, any ambiguity and doubt they are creating, there are no semantics involved in those emails, except the last one, about locking his room door going to the bathroom, that does sound a bit ambiguous but I have explained the situation and it should follow when you look into the conversation with Adam following the timestamp on that email, and timestamps on my blog or the dialogue with Adam, that my investment and work is my own. (2)

Further, I have repeatedly read through the relays, "Don't let idiots talk to you out of it, if you have an idea." -Stan Lee.

Presentation is already discovered as a lie. Therefore the ship that is included in it. It is lying about everything.

However, if to separate, and judging by the relays on this keeps popping up as I speak of the ships,

How would you possibly deter someone away from it?

If a person has asserted an idea, then they have a good probability of it working, alongside WHY it is useful. It is their intellect that came with it in the first place.

I have told you my motivations behind it, and the history behind it, why it came to be that way.

First it is the fastest way to create ships for a beginner. Who doesn't know how to build a ship. You simply interconnect the wood, and subtract from it.

Second, buoyancy will remain. It will float.

Then how would someone deter another away from such idea? What is its excuse?

 

What exactly is it saying?

What is the reasoning I used to convinced him out of the idea?

May I ask?

Does that make sense?

Or is it a bogus lie?

Can that reasoning easily be countered had anyone have an intellect?

 

Because nothing, no reasons can talk a person out of something that can ONLY work.

 

So you will see that it is lying by an narrative as well.