intent is what determines the charges.

lethal intent continues.

 

its actions stem not only from hate crime,

but framing, on bodily harm, in order to take my life.

 

if framing on intellectual property was reduced,

its nature still stand alongside its previous chapter.

 

it means nothing has changed as intent.

so how can the punishment be lessened to imprisonment by its manipulation?

it is a declaration it will live, and it will still choose/continue to harm.

 

and for whatever it is misleading,

see my email that differentiates its path,

its attentiveness throughout in all those reminders,

whatever it is, by correlation or repeating usage, or improvement.

it simply is forcing its way as declaration to harm.

 

i have the right in my defense.

the court must take recognition that,

my ideas are no ordinary ideas.

it can decide fate of a country for better or for worse.

its damage here and now, to the future, unless fully confessed is unimaginable.

 

you must see this as a calculated act to save its own life,

while declaring contuation of harm.

NOTHING has changed.

and i have the right in my self-defense.

 

it deliberately leaves doubt. why do you think that is?

its lethal intent remains.

its force, remains.

 

-----------

seeing laura's relay.

NO. there never was any love triangle.

i hardly ever spoke to her and left a note under door,

having a different gender roommate is uncomfortable.  

(because we have to share the bathroom)

as I was moving downstairs to the basement.

she kept running into the bathroom as i

(in my own room, but you can hear the person moving inside)

was preparing myself to go to the bathroom.

no doubt she commented about odor and all.

 

and that is it.

 

i have no idea who this girl is.

i seldom spoke to her, and that is her behind her own door,

opened just enough so we can talk face to face.

and in brief moments. maybe like 5 times.

so she's completely lying if she says love triangle.

 

barry, iris, eddie love triangle in the Flash.

and iris is part black/white girl so.

what is the deal with that.

i am often relayed as barry.

 

hey. i don't really know who you are.

and if you are saying this, this too is evil.

this is every intent to scam.

you picked the wrong person.

people know i'm alone.

 

----------

 

both you idiots listen.

when you confess, confess fully.

oherwise you only show your intent to harm.

 

you have already confessed.

you lost.

 

there would never be lies had 'few' been stolen.

you would have only focused on that then, had they existed,

since the beginning.

 

you only continue to frame.

this is to diminish your sentence by an excuse, by framing.

this is to declare your dedication to my ruin,

and to your benefit.

as you know i am driven. as you know i know the truth.

 

it will only backfire on you.

 

they are still playing a game of doubt.

lessening their overall perceived crimes by framing and self-justification,

this is the same game.

and it is a declaration harm will proceed.

 

confession again, like it has misled the first time,

this second time, STILL is using that tactic.

making you vulnerable, buying empathy.

making itself look 'honest'.

and going at it still.

 

it is a psychological manipulation.

gaslighting.

i'm still the target as their charges lessen.

you are being toyed right now.

 

 

full confession or no deal.

this is in my right as self-defense.

 

and this thing is rotten to its evil, evil core.

so see it persist and charge him accordingly.

 

it will be uncovered whatever it is.

by then, no confession should be permitted as reason for lesser charges.

 

it was grit, mayhem to the very end.

 

 

actually it is already proved.

but if to find more by the content.

more will be discovered as attentiveness and reminders.

and it will be determined.

 

no confession should change the outcome of its capital punishment by then.

 

Confess you idiot. They have enough to overrule any of your crazy claims.

They have enough to understand that you are framing, still.

Don't believe you can get away with it.

 

Please dismiss Elon Musk, when he says "Do not kill."

He's been a deceiver for 2 motives.

1. to save them, no matter what the cost.

2. to deter me, cancel me, no matter what the cost.

 

that cost was my torment, my suffering, obstruction of justice.

so you must dismiss his words.

 

his words always demands my sacrifice.

this is about continued pursuit of harm that won't cease.

Steve is EVIL to its core.

 

Repeat:

I forgot if I pasted the whole thing.

------------

Something important comes to mind.

This is *an attempted murder trial by Steve we are forgetting.

And treating it like confession to theft.

When it actually is confession to attempted murder.

Hear me out in this writing:

by the way, its second confession, is confession to destroy.

destroying the origins = my death.

this follows framing on bodily harm aiming at my life.

 

so it actually ends then.

unless i dismiss its charges, the law must determine it as attempted murder,

and by how many times? categorically is twice, but by repeats is impossible numbers.

 

so this is actually the law, dealing from what is already convicted as repeating murder.

doesn't it mean it is convicted no matter what?

 

it's because we are confused that its confessing on theft of intellectual property, suddenly we believe we can put it to prison instead,

but this is actually about an MURDER attempt.

(whatever attempting now, as it tries to continue framing, doesn't matter. we are now talking about what it has DONE) even if what is says now is true (which isn't) it does not justify its actions of attempting murder. Does it?

 

first phase with the confession. that was perjury.

second phase with attempted theft of many. that was destruction, aiming to mislead the origins so to have me blamed for everything here. THAT is attempted MURDER.

 

and only the victim now has the say in letting him go because further possibilities of harm depends on its honesty and character.

and no. I don't let it go. because I know what this this. As does the court.

 

 

In summary, this is a hate crime with subjugation by violence,
attempted murder by framing, bodily harm.
attempted murder by framing, intellectual properties of many numbers.

whatever it does now, which is continued framing, does not justify above attempts.

It is series of heinous and lethal crimes, designed to take a person's life,
understanding the situation, fully aware of the outcome.

So many people are being convicted, and some of them for attempted murder.
They are facing the death penalty.

Had I misled the origins of the ideas, then that of course, becomes my death penalty.
I would have been the one causing all this chaos and knowingly, and falsely defending myself aware of the death penalty people are facing. (1)

As does with the bodily harm, when I exposed its hate crimes and suggested, alongside all it has done, be eligible for capital punishment before the mediator for fair assessment.

If I am framing, when if the origins began with me causing it bodily harm. All its actions become nullified into self-justification and I become the blame. That is death penalty on to me. (2)

 

So what part of its framing is not attempted murder? And to what duration, how many times?

It is ALREADY convicted for attempted murder.

 

Oh. And very important part here as well.

Many were to enter into capital punishment because of Steve's misleads on the origins of my ideas.

And yet it still continued.

It's not only attempted murder on to me,

but willful deliberate negligence of other people's charges, people who were trying to support him.

What is a psychopath?

This was attempted multiple murders.

 

 

When I made the deal, the deal was to confess fully therefore there would be no dangers following. No intent lingered. Ends there and then.

Not to partially confess, so to still mislead the authorities, to diminish its sentence. As it knew there is no way out of it.

And to just keep going on making me into the sacrifice, knowing the harm. Knowing how driven I would be, therefore an declaration for war.

 

And whatever it is doing now, its continued effort.

 

IT DOESN'T JUSTIFY ABOVE CRIMES DOES IT?

It's repeated attempted murder by suppressing its conscience.

 

So yes. Absolutely. It deserves the capital punishment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

so yes, it means the ultimate say is with me i believe.

because it still is on pursuit of harm by lethal intent.

 

and they are obvious lies by the yes of the law.

it is simply continued.

 

I have the right in judging its character. as i am the victim.