On Adam's relay on "AR15" being weak.
Well, Elon Musk is there to shave off the numbers of my ideas at his whim, at his mood, and nearest to his convenience and self-justification first of all. That's been going on for, forever.
As all of you whose been here knows. The numbers change constantly. How many times? Why wouldn't it be just once instead the 300th time? Your ego is at play.
Secondly, it wouldn't be if I wasn't targeted and fronted of copycats like Steve to both keep me from productivity feeding it, and deliberately hiding the order so to give it power.
But there is no redemptive quality. Mr Musk will act as if he is remorseful, and only goes back to his 'willful' ways. That is about suppression.
Like I said, the law must resolve and punish THEN give me sufficient time to recuperate in this competition, as I was hustled.
If I didn't win through all those attempt to destroy me that is. You already know I can Mr Musk. That is coming up with enough ideas to win at my focus.
Leaving Elon Musk as the sole creditor of my ideas? That is like giving fish to a cat and telling it not to eat it. He won't resist in bringing me down at his impulse.
No. I'm not weak. They made me this way. At the very least you permited this environment of attacks. You allowed my abusers to participate Mr Musk.
Have some sense of honor.
What people don't recognize is how exactly is Elon Musk crosses the line in his self-justification constantly. Irony is that he SEEMS selfless with the rewards, but by credit,
he cannot CONTROL HIMSELF.
That is only to me. Yeah you can praise me all you like but I can't trust you and that isn't my paranoia. Adam. You have some technical justification and experience to supporting why my other ideas would work. Is it too much to ask if you point out instances where Elon deliberately takes it out in his convenience and unreasonable excuses?
Or if anyone else. You know way he is.
It's like he was strangling me constantly so I won't be able to breathe.
Added:
But say if I am over-crediting my ideas and it realy is "15" in the end.
Then when can I work?
The law must eliminate the exploitation. And I can't be feeding these people, to follow up, build, and say this is theirs because we worked more on it, or we created a better variation,
or worse,
to cause more headaches to the judges by feeding my attackers constantly aiming at creating doubt of its origins.
So I am waiting.
Only focusing on the law at the moment.
---------
By now you must understand what kind of heinous thing this Steve is.
It's crossed the whatever bridge, leaving behind any humanity or conscience.
What you see is a maniac determined to destroy my life,
and he must be punished accordingly. There is no other way.
-----------
If there isn't a conspiracy going on with Elon Musk at a surface level,
there is on a subtle level that is inconspicuous, ambiguous as to the mass,
but if you reason it out in technicality, is feasible, and lucrative most likely.
Once you understand the nature of the person,
the rest can be predicted.
So who is the antagonizing critic to Elon Musk's selective negative reasoning?
Someone positive enough to try supporting my ideas and rationalize technical feasibility and potential of effect of it all?
Is there anyone or do you just leave it to Elon Musk alone as the rewards are his money therefore his decision solely, despite his charges regarding intellectual property and mayhem?
-----------
I worry about King Charles' mental acuity as I keep reading "You know very little boy",
when I am making valid points. He didn't strike me as the gullible type,
but if you are, by technical matters, maybe it would be a good idea to have someone see it better.
Don't you have a "Q" type of character in James Bond movies?
I get the feeling despite your help on the law, management of my ideas are untracked and unsupported.
---------
Corrected spelling error.
My points are generalized but when you think deeper into it,
you would know what they are doing.
There is no point to this unless we are allowing creation of doubt by narrative despite the lies proven.
"Dean is fed up with time travel."
There is no "time travel" but only the intent to create doubt.
Why would there be lies?
Why would you permit more as you already figured out its intent?
Of course you are fed up.
See all the logic by the timeline. Confession as the focal point,
what exists prior (my ideas) does not exist (Steve claiming my ideas as his)
because the confession exists.
what exist after (my ideas) does not exist (Steve claiming my ideas as his)
impossible duration in which it is only focused on theft and no foresight.
Anything else it is saying is a blatant lie, to try to create a stalemate by doubt.
It would hold no valid evidence the court can use, because it doesn't exist.
Only than through narratives, it willl try creating doubt, but you have the right to dismiss it,
as you've encountered lies!
And my situation, to that number, how can anyone present something that isn't theirs,
being in the blind? It is an statiscal impossibility, not even an anomaly. Impossibility.
This is a heinous thing, and it must be charged at this point.
And no, I could not have countered all this predicting the outcome of their actions
unless first knowing i'm innocent, while being blind to the channel!
That is enough!
---------------
People's gullibility,
or their willingness to be persuaded,
whichever way,
it sickens me.