"Ryan Reynolds is the new Steve Jobs" and the thumbnail says,

"It's all connected." With images of photos connected to a string.

 

I see. So this person really is antagonizing me in favor of Steve.

 

My guess is that whatever he is seeing from his perspective

is the internal ecosystem that is created while being a copycat.

 

What he would be dismissing then is the timeline in which they came about.

Of which, can only be a follow up from me. And there would be witnesses.

 

After all that logic i've said. That I can't present an idea that is someone elses.

And lies admitted from Steve since the beginning and in-between to the now.

Why would you support this person?

 

I apologize if i'm reading the relays wrong.

 

But if these attempts to promote Steve has been going on with Mr Reynolds,

I will not attempt to protect him either.

 

 

"Ryan Reynolds goes to war with (B)rie (L)arson!"

It very much annoys me often the avatar relayed to me is female through Youtube.

However, I am seeing many relays from Youtube that Mr Reynolds is indeed antagonizing me.

 

I am sorry but you have already lost. You are only creating an illusion. A narrative by your perspective. But it will be seen through.

 

I can only speak with confidence as I am innocent.

Every idea. And I mean, EVERY idea.

Is mine.

 

I cannot present it otherwise,

and would need to confess immediately, if otherwise.

 

The fact that there are no controversies of overlaps

and witnesses supporting, already disproves your claims. Whatever it is.

 

But I do feel, creeped out by these attempts.

And I feel the need to speak out, in case a misdirect is happening.

 

I also get that, your way out, is perhaps making me looking like the villain.

I don't know what you've done to be suggested of capital punishment.

 

But I believe these attempts in the eyes of the law, must count.

AS what you ultimately suggest is destruction over a person's life one form or the other.

And whilst knowing it would result into MY capital punishment had it been true.

 

And the only thing you should have done, is to remain neutral.

Instead try being an investigator. It cannot work well, as you are forcing a perspective.

Not evidence. It would be counted as an narrative.

And that is where the danger is at, for you.

 

I obviously cannot see anything you are suggesting. But from the thumbnail,

I get the feeling had I seen your written words,

I would say..., "Of course you are seeing it that way!" Followed by an explanation.

Which I hope someone else will do.

This is speculative, but it seems like the only logical thing to say based on that thumbnail.

 

 

--------

 

Overall, I believe their next move, as a group.

Must lean toward a deeper conspiracy theory.

 

This again, is creating doubt. It is not based on reality.

Reality is that we are all human beings,

and our actions are based on either hopes or fear. In this case.

 

And you must first judge, whether I am capable of feeling fear.

And that if I am irrational enough to suggest someone else's idea, had it been his.

In this situation being in the blind.

 

And you must dissect Steve's psychology and behavior as well.

That is the basis of your logical faith.

However, by  your ego and self-justification, you've all lost your common sense.

 

And that is where it begins.

Your narratives are your intelligence that is creating.

Not the truth that must be uncovered by logic.

 

In essence, you are acting by prejudice,

and no matter what you say, it will always return to that base.

Because you would be lacking many elements to your narratives.

 

You are the victim of your own ego.

And one can rule that out as 'stupidity' as well.

Self-justification.

 

But know that, the victim is being further attacked.

By a group of vigilantes, set out on a witch hunt.

Whether you like it or not, that is how the law will see it.

 

So the correct thing to do, was to recede after seeing

many evidences of Steve's malice.

 

But you refuse to. Why?

Fucking idiots.

 

 

Well, reading back again. I sound like an idiot priest.

But you get what I am saying.

It's just impossible as a human being with any normal sense of give and take,

and fear of the law.

 

But Steve is not anywhere in the realm of exemplary behavior, he is a violator.

 

And from that alone, you should not be supporting him and remain neutral, at least.

 

 

It is all narrative, follow ups, adaptation, improvisation.

Ok?

Anybody can do that.

It's just leveraging on this one single fact, and no more than this:

 

That it was physically beside me as an roommate.

 

That is it.

 

But no ideas were exchanged, or asserted by Steve.

 

I worked alone and every evidence indicates that clearly.

 

Whether through emails,

or the timing and behavior in which this person came into the channel,

and the duration it attempted theft on my ideas only to confess.

 

But somehow you ignore all this. That absolution.

 

And to me, as the victim.

 

There is the evil in that.

 

Because you are after my life. No matter what is there as evidence.

You are WILLING. WANTING to look into that direction to support my attacker.

 

And not to buy your empathy. Fuck you essentially.

But I am heartbroken by that.

 

What prejudice?

Is it because way I look?

That I haven't entered college?

I don't know.

 

But if  you were to let me work again without these attacks,

I can create something worthy, infinite number of times with better *efficiency than before.

 

And I just don't understand.

Why people choose to ignore the fundamental principles of how this is already resolved,

but pushed into a cycle by a person who is creating doubt by narratives and lies.

 

Please do not support this person.

 

-------

 

"Laura" keeps coming up with previous relays that connects to antagonization towards me.

This person then, alongside her attempted framing in a love triangle prior.

And having stayed silent since the moment she came online, and pounced after a very long time. That is more than 2 years I believe to the moment when she was accusing me of a love triangle.

This means that she was judging what was happening, and as Steve was being the copycat,

following up after my ideas, and noticing that there are no timestamps, and creation of doubt by many, she joined in the behavior. She was being an opportunist seeing the environment.

Where was she when Steve was attempting theft and confessing? Why then was silence?

When she came online into the channel, must be checked. If since the beginning, then

this girl is a scammer. And she is framing me by creating stories right now, with Steve.

Or misled by Steve, but the confession exists and she stayed silent then.

So bottom line is that, she is a scammer, and the U.S law must charge her, and we will agree to extradition.

Note that this framing is aiming at my life. That is the inevitable outcome had their claims worked. Hence she deserves whatever the law will assign to her.

I have no mercy in people who suppresses their conscience.

Please read this writing carefully, I believe I have asserted ways to find evidence on her intent. There is no way, this is not pre-meditated.

 

 

You are all fucking with the wrong person. I hope you know that.

We are going all the fucking way. CUNTS.

 

 

She will force a lie, but more technicalities one finds on her attention towards the channel,

and by the events that has occured, as well as her initial framing supporting Steve,

claiming a love triangle, (which is a serious accusation and there is no misunderstanding about that)

this girl's silence then, or some contradictions, only to pounce at an opportune moment

seeing the flow of the channel turning to Steve's preparation noticing that there are no timestamps,

she is framing me with Steve right now. This is it.

Revolve around the confession, dismiss any claims of diluting that confession.

See how every idea I asserted was seen by Steve until to that moment of confession

AND its apologies of theft even AFTER the confession.

Only to try again noticing the patterns of the environment and that is without the timestamps.

These must be the moments Laura is joining in.

And noticing how Elon Musk is supporting Steve as well.

 

This is group conspiracy. And I am being targeted.

 

I don't know what exactly is that they are aiming. Which of my ideas.

But try and see contradictions. When Steve admitted to lying recently,

by fronting vigilantism, were those ideas before the confession.

of which was detected when I suggested its apology and being silent for a while thereafter?

(Until another try juding the environment)?

 

What exactly is it that they are aiming for? If they are suggesting a collab,

then it must already be dismissed by the confession and that apology.

 

I have no clue what is going on. It shouldn't make sense, their timing,

their stories, it is out of the timeline. This is an adaptation to pre-meditated

understanding of the manipulative environment that is without the timestamps.

They would have started off with that when they came on to the channel,

instead mugging and confession, and yet another tries and apology.

 

 

As whatever they interacted must have been misled by Steve

or if this is a fabrication that is created with Laura.

 

 

Note also, I would not be sending my ideas prior to that confession,

to Festus. Festus is someone who was INTRODUCED to me by Steve.

Their acquaintance is deeper than mine.

On a more personal level, not business. Enough to enter a bar together.

Hence if I am sending my ideas to Festus, and claiming that they are my ideas.

That would be suicidal. Festus can send those emails to Steve and it would immediately create a controversy.

I sent that email to Festus on what I came up with, as the writing itself I presented on the channel.

Steve had checked every one of those ideas while in the channel. He must have.

And throughout those 400 days, there is not a single one he missed.

The confession was confession of all that was attempted stolen by Steve, NOT just the space escalator.

 

Wed, Sep 1 2021 - is the day I am sending to Festus my ideas.

And on Mon, Jan 10- 2022 - which is

I am sending to Festus

I guess that isn't that important.

 

What is important is that, Steve had seen all my ideas within those 400+ days I had submitted,

and then resulted in CONFESSION of theft by jealousy. I have been fighting him

in those 400+ days, as I am working on new ones as well. What was his stance on the ideas back then?

And if one can speak out on that environment, that within those 400+ days,
until to the moment of confession,

my ideas were being improved, repeated in discussion, and displayed in the open so Steve has indeed seen them all.

As well as any contradictions of support or apology following.

It is only in the now, that these people are adapting. This was a prepared thing over time.

So I have no idea what is going on, but they are creating a false narrative.

 

 

 

Also, may I request a investigation into Laura's internet service provider,

and see which communication medium she is using in the last several years?

Through whichever devices?

They would most likely hide it, but there could be some kind of chat dialogue together to frame me or something like that.

 

I have no idea what is going on, but if they are connecting to my ideas,

and claiming it as theirs, then that is framing.

 

It doesn't make sense.

 

 

 

 

 

and there would not be a confession in the first place, WITHOUT mentioning what was stolen from him, will there?

It is confessing about theft of intellectual property by jealousy if i'm not wrong.

Why would it not state I had stolen something from him as part of it?

 

That's the topic.

 

So anything, and everything that was before the confession. Was the confession that there was nothing between him and I. And every idea that I came up with and presented,

is valid.

 

And I am guessing, Laura and Steve is now trying to take those from me, despite all the contradictions made prior.

So they are desperate in trying to get away with all this when it shouldn't even make sense.

 

Steve is far more chaotic and danger than one understands.

Look what it is doing to people.

It's become a parasite of my life in order to become a ' destiny thief' by trying to kill me.

And this cannot be tolerated.

 

And no, I am not the one who is misleading.

So this is fucking chaos for me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(to all that it has stole, which included

everything I sent to Festus) getting confused by my own grammar XD

 

 

And if this Laura is suggesting a collaboration with Steve.

Was this Steve's description back then as well?

Does that description align with Laura on a collaboration?

Or is he contradicting himself and this is an sudden adaptation?

 

 

What i've written now must hold the keys to finding out the truth of the matter.

That they are misleading right now.

Or if there are other permutations I am unaware of, please suggest this,

as you read my writing. One may know better when you were there.

 

 

Maybe. Maybe she is speaking from a place of being misled by Steve.

But at this point, when the past is clear. Actually, there is no way

she kept silent until now as compared to the moment she came on to the channel

and stayed silent then. This was an adaptation and prepared thing.

But I will leave the investigation to you. I can only suggest.

I wish I was there to see what is going on.

 

I recall, when I was still upstairs, beside Laura's room.

I knocked on her door and told her of the situation at hand.

So she must cover her cameras and all.

I was going around the house and knocking on everyone's door about that.

 

And you would think, I would present somene else's idea?

Being in the blind and disadvantaged, unknowing as to what would be overlaps,

had this person came up with this idea?

 

I don't think so.

 

Something seriously sinister is going on here, and I am not the one who can be manipulating

the situation. Starting with Steve, this framing is spread out. To which level and awareness

of the framing, I cannot assume, but I have suggested ways to figure that out I believe...

 

So I will leave it to your investigation.

 

 

If Laura is found guilty. She is not just a 2nd tier misled, but willful framing is there.

And she must be charged fully.

 

"Love triangle" was the dead giveaway. She completely is aware there was nothing
between herself and I. So that was framing that somehow she misdirected into her freedom,
and is now manifesting in an different type of framing adapting to the situation.

Like I am saying once you understand the nature of the person, their behavior becomes

predictable. And I hope I have asserted enough permutations of logic to find out
they are blatantly forcing themselves right now, despite their contradictions.