Sounds like Mr Reynolds keeps on attacking.

Either you are attacking from surface level reasoning,

or by creating a narrative closer to framing.

My guess is, surface level understanding.

But this depends on when you came on to the channel.

Then if you have been attentive, you should know better.

One way or another, it will be figured out Mr Reynolds.

Do not side with my attackers. You are on the losing end.

I am innocent. Every idea is indeed mine.

 

--------

"Captain America steals Iron man's armor."

Like I said, every idea is mine, and so are the armor ideas.

There were many variations I attempted.

If the idiot had similar interest to mine, then that is a common interest among many.

If not most.

Seek, on the fact that it would be a follow up. Ask the witnesses.

If it had asserted an armor idea, that would either follow from my SpaceX suit, or,

it will not relate to my ideas in features.

It is just trying to latch on to my ideas and trying to make a forced connection,

so it can steal. As many industries become covered, so does the chances of commonality

increase. And one shouldn't buy into it with careful deduction of the events.

Please understand where this person is coming from and what the nature of all this is.

It is first of all, impossible that ANYONE in this situation would assert however MANY ideas

it had tried claiming as his, being in the blind. And there would never be lies, had anything

been stolen, nor will it attempt theft, then confess, and that confession would not contain a report.

This is force, brutality. Creating doubt.

And by the law, I believe with all the series of lies that is already detected,

alongside the situational proof of all things, exploitation in the environment,

that its claims, unless there is an actual tangible evidence, it must be dismissed.

And for that reason, (tangible evidence) had I stolen anything from anyone,

I must confess immediately. For I do not know what can happen to that idea.

Perhaps a collaboration, timestamps exchanged between people and left as a source in servers. WHO KNOWS.

And I am not a person with self-destructive intent.

I look forward to the future and I am a futurist.

I live for the prospects of the future.

Hence I cannot, put myself in a disadvantaged situation.

 

This person is a heinous individual. And authorities must see through what it does.

And please recognize that my predictions thus far, I could not have known the outcome,

without first knowing that I am innocent.

It is hard to remember what I pointed out as foresight, but if you will look back from

time to time, you will know this.

 

I hope the better witnesses will help out. As well as its stance, during those times.

Whatever it is. It must have either acknowledged it is mine, passive or direct,

while being fully attentive to the situation. It is only in preparation to the prospects

of exploitation that, it is suddenly asserting false accusations, framing.

And the beginning, however the duration until to the moment of confesssion,

and even thereafter, its stance, its silence in acknowledgement,

all this must be counted. For however many days that was, and, when it started

attempting theft again. I believe that would be after observation of how the environment was.

It is prone to exploitation and recognizing how people are repeating this,

it has joined in with a heinous intent. And those moments should be uncovered.