Do you see how it is about me WORKING ALONE?
And that i'm trying to get out of his hair?
Leave each other alone?
Do you see how for him, his designation, his path
is separate, on pursuit of an MBA?
Do you see how i'm suggesting Robert Kiyosaki's books?
Just before that email, I am sorry for making noise in my room.
So I am sending that email as an apology. Look:
Do you idiots STILL want to argue semantics?
It is PLAIN SIGHT.
And what I relayed yesterday, that is the what FOLLOWS.
It means there was NOTHING between him and I.
You are all idiots.
If you believed in him.
-----------
"Ryan Reynolds goes to war with Brie Larson."
Change "bye bye bye" to "die die die" and listen to it.
I am the original deadpool. XDDD
Not trying to be cruel, if that capital punishment is serious.
I'm joking.
But really. You need to stop.
Evidence is right there in the open.
-----------
I am remembering it accurately.
I am literally saying "to get out of your hair."
Argue with the semantics on that. I don't think so.
It is exactly as you see. He and I were separate.
And the email I showed you yesterday shows that differentiation.
His path is his own.
My path is my own.
Do you see what kind of heinous person this is?
Do you see how its pursuits are there to destroy my life, make it ruinous?
Do you see what kind of madness, persistence, this is?
And even gathering supporters creating doubt?
--------
Whatever it says it will be a lie.
You can plainly see what is going on.
And my email from yesterday shows that absolute separation of paths,
from myself to Steve. Along with what I am showing you here.
Any supporters trying to help him,
I believe all they are trying to do, is trying to save people.
By making me into the sacrifice.
In their minds, the worst thing that can happen to me,
is what? Cancellation? Or are they aware of the dangers of supporting framing?
The outcome is my death.
No. I would never mislead on intellectual property.
Had I. I would have to confess immediately.
There are no factors I can see as sight.
It would spell every danger on to me.
That is enough.
You have more than enough people.
Do not buy into its misleads.
-----------
So you have now the trinity:
1. My trigger of the idea with Adam, in our dialogue, and our disputes later on as well.
Alongside its (Steve) attentiveness all this time, only to contradict itself from desperation.
2. You have tangible evidence on myself working alone, and in recognition that I am trying to "get out of his hair." I am completely separate from him in business. He has his own pursuits in MBA, and I am suggesting this to him, supporting him with Robert Kiyosaki's materials.
3. That is further differentiated at the end of the timeline, with the email I have showed you
yesterday. That my investment is my own.
-----
What follows next, whether you have the history or not. Is its appearance on the channel,
the moment it got out of the house. And attempting mugging with its brother. Which also led to confession after impossible number of days attentive to it all.
So. You have everything now. And everything else should fall into place.
Unless one prefers to hear its endless lies.
On my printed presentation. I believe I asked help on Steve to print that out.
And gave him a chance to read it, as thanks for holding on.
And after this he introduced me to Festus when I needed help on the financial projection.
Everything, from where it began with Adam, its progression of me working alone,
and times near to when he is moving out, there is every evidence of our paths being separate.
And what follows next, is what you already witnessed. How irrelogical and impossible it is.
By the motive, situation, emotions, involved to all.
And all it has been doing is persisting on its crime where it began.
----------
Seeing some weird relays on hacking then deleting.
I was hacked by Adam or someone during those times.
I was writing about my defenses in allegation I believe,
and those were something private,
I formatted it, and what Adam extracted (or if it was anyone else)
was distorted remnants of the files.
But I got paranoid and destroyed the disks myself.
But this has nothing to do with intellectual property of course.
And again, I don't know how people get persuaded by distorting the order in their minds. If they are.
Presenting someone else's ideas, when I cannot see the channel,
means every detail I would mutter, is a chance for verification, and overlaps of the person
who came up with it before I. Had there been.
And recognizing Steve is there since the beginning, mugging on my ideas and leading to confession.
What chance is there for me to present something that is his?
And the ultimate proof of that is, that THERE CANNOT BE OVERLAPS that can't be explained.
So while it may look suspicious on what I did with the disks, logically, it doesn't make sense to correlate this with intellectual property.
It is exactly that, my allegations I was paranoid of.
Why would there be confession from Steve as these things were going on(my being hacked and destroying the disks) and NOT accusing me of anything back then? The timing doesn't make sense as well.
Let alone. Again. 1 idea. Among all those ideas it claims as his. There would not be lies, had there been truth to be on pursuit, to uncover.
And again. Today. That trinity of facts destroys any doubt.
It is TANGIBLE evidence.
Whatever they are doing is creation of doubt by narrative.