It's toying with your lack of attendance during those times I believe, the authorities.

Please do not buy into it.

 

It would've been a controversy since the beginning had it been.

 

The presentation is obviously one of the first things came up with.

 

And now that everything is countered, in its defeat,

 

it is aiming for the beginning.

 

 

And they are attempting at my life right now.

 

This is another attempt at framing.

 

And this is attempted murder.

 

 

And this is by narratives. Prejudice. Witch hunts.

 

Of which the evidence is already clear on its beginning (with Adam) (1)

process, (myself working alone, and stating reasons i'm getting out of its hair) (2)

it's acknowledment whose it is (by reading it and introducing me to Festus) (3)

and the finale in the email stating a different path, that my investment is my own. (4)

 

Did he not acknowledged that it was mine, since all those times until to the now. I wrote the presentation myself?

I recall at one point it was an issue, on who came up with it, Adam or myself. And claiming rights. Where was its stance then.

and also for a short while, I was being accused of creating a movement by spamming by Biden using this presentation. And let me ask, how would that be an negative, to your country? I'd be providing a service for your economy. It's a free, useful information.

(I was being accused of this, until I showed the receipt, trying to keep it between Adam and I and Anna hacked it and released it)

(I also have email records on Steve helping me out with the print out of Adam's address)

(Which also means he was in awareness of our interaction with the presentation and did not mention any involvement by him on-screen, by the emails, or when he came on to the channel).

This of course, came much later, long after Steve's confession. So in more recent times. If it makes an excuse on that.  

So between the times of its first appearance, and to the moment of confession, which is over 400 days, and, even after, all this time. It wouldn't mention that it was involved with me?

Did it somehow look ahead in such an irrelogical accusation? I don't think so.

As you can clearly see by the emails, I am clearly working alone. "To get out of his hair" (1)

It knows I am all the way, involed with Adam. Even helping me out with the address print out to Adam. (2)

AND. Who would allow someone to write something alone, had it been its idea? We would separate parts of writing and credit each other before submission. And clearly knowing I am being invested by an investor on that idea? And I am being connected to an investor? Does this make any sense at all? (3)

And Festus will vouch for me, that there was no collaboration with Steve. Steve introduced me to Festus. Of course that would be the first thing I would mention it to Festus. How will I get away with it? And its interaction at the bar with Festus would not have said any involvement. (4)

AND aware of the investment amount. As you can see in the last emails. (5)

AND that its path is separated from mine. Which is determined in the emails. (6)

AND its stance, as we, Adam and I were fighting over the rights, and NUMEROUS NUMEROUS times the website was mentioned since the beginning. (7)

 

 

It has a lied a thousand times and it is lying once more. Please understand.

It's trying to act like my mentor, someone 'above' me. By its narcissistic psychosis.

 

Then why would I be the one writing it?

 

Then why would there be triggers in my conversation with Adam?

 

And please refer back to my highlight (3) above. I think that is the main factor of proof right there.