"Kill Napoleon *Bonaparte!"

hahahaha you framing fucks.

 

i did no wrong against your country and against this competition you initiated.

 

 

so.

 

fuck~~~

 

you~~~.

 

 

enter hell.

 

Seeing some series of weird relays here.

Death imposed on me by someone close.

'betrayal' by someone close.

"greg" falsed accused of death penalty.

and earlier that "i'm not a lizard" with zuckerberg.

 

with what exactly is that Mark is accusing me of? if i'm reading this correctly?

either misunderstanding or framing.

 

or if i'm reading this entire thing wrong, then i apologize.

 

i think i'm reading it wrong, Mark is supportive as far as i understand.

if otherwise, what you think is wrong. whatever it is.

 

no that can't be right. i think i'm reading the relays wrong.

 

but if it is. authorities must see that from where zuckerberg is,

and where i am, he can only be misleading,

for everything is recorded in the open.

 

if a such thing  is going on with zuckerberg.

 

see also contradictions,

and whatever he says must be without evidence but word of mouth, speculation or opinion.

but if he is making it sound like an statement,

then he must be charged.

who am i fooling in this situation about anything?

 

Adam was present at all times as well.

So unless they are together to frame me, he would speak the truth.

 

one must also see, if this is following any charges against zuckerberg,

and this is out of spite.

 

 

Alright anger rising...

Let me try and use deductive reasoning.

 

So first thing I saw was the "offering business presentation to write" and there was the name mark in it. With Steve jobs.

and shortly after followed Zuckerberg's "i'm not a lizard" thing.

 

So I don't know what exactly is going on.

If this idiot is stating that I worked on the presentation with Steve,

 

so many things:

1. Steve admitted he read the presentation after I finished it. That I wrote it alone. I think he tried misleading this as well, but confessed specifically, or generally, which followed the mugging and confession, and the presentation was written before it.

2. I am clearly writing to Steve the progress of the presentation I am writing, of which i am writing alone, along with my interaction with Adam at the time. Check the emails and messages toward Adam.

3. Steve would have said something to Festus if he was involved in writing the presentation.
Just after the presentation was written, I asked Steve to introduce me to Festus because Zuckerberg and Adam was I think asking for a projection of a kind. And Festus held an MBA.

 

My guess. Zuckerberg was charged for his attempt to hijack my *website idea, and using it as *business without my permission.

So now he is trying to dilute the origins with forced reasoning, so that he would have 'rights' as someone thieving as a 2nd tier? Making me look like a thief? This must be it.

 

No. Absolutely not. I worked alone.

 

And Zuckerberg must be contradicting himself, having supported me prior against Steve.

 

So this is a classic case of, suppressing conscience with the website,

and this is a follow-up as this forced defense *because he is being charged.

He is suppressing his conscience for the second time, to save himself.

 

And I am being framed, if he is saying this as a statement.

 

And I am sorry Mark, I did not want this for you, but you must be charged.

 

So IF that has happened, if Zuckerberg really did attack me by framing,

if this was said as a statement,

he must be charged.

 

That is IF Zuckerberg's attacks happened.

Otherwise I apologize for the misread.