------------

Let's try and measure the probability per timeline, per events.

 

1. understand there are no, and cannot be tangible evidences as none exists,

and every possible angles have been covered as improbability, impossibility.

its lies and deceit, along with its intent, since the beginning with his brother,

without verification to its statement of theft, not aiming for an presentation of its own ideas,

and aiming straight for, theft, with his brother, when it had JUST gotten out of the house I was in, and entered into that channel has been caught.

alongside its every chance to verify within the house fully aware of all verification system is

set in place. it doesn't exist because it never happened.

 

Chances of it not verifying itself within and out the house? = ZERO.

 

2. as i am saying, my interaction and reciprocation means there are no overlap with steve.

that all my ideas came before him. he was trying to dilute the order, and others were fronting him or misled by him due to their late arrival.

i can only know this being blind, knowing that i am innocent.

 

Chances of it being its own ideas, when it is ONLY following up after my ideas, (in that MANY) = ZERO.

the chances of me presenting these ideas to a channel that i'm blind to, had it someone elses = ZERO.

 

3. if we must be technical about it. authorities, do you see where it began with its brother?

as it fronted its brother on the gay slurs and threats and without stopping it,

it went on to attempting theft? this was fronting it for subjugation, installation of fear.

its later mocking was an confirmation of its prejudice, and again, never stopping its brother.

if the court is deliberately buying into these people's diversion.

you are showing lenience at the expense of the victim.

always it is that way.

 

Chances of it not being a hate crime, aiming to subjugate, assigning an identity, continued prejudice, violating its way into my life? = ZERO

 

4. And per idea, the details of excuses. Its lies have been caught prior.

Among other types of framing as well. Such as it saying i've beaten it up.

 

Chances of at least 'few' being its own idea after lying about the 'rest'? When nothing overlaps, and coming in only after my presentation? = Close to zero.

(It would stick to this 'few' had it existed instead the lies)

 

 

The chances of this thing being an evil maniac determined to destroy my life?

= 100%.