And I am unsure of this, but please check to see if there were other designs

of the starlink logo on a box. I am most likely wrong but it may have been an
single line towards the middle that enters a dot. (Perhaps)

Either way, he is suggesting an impossibility.

Both physical (never met) and psychological (impossible to relay to me the details of 'his'

design) and if my idea was triggered by that photo, credit would still belong to me,

as it is my mind creating the inner workings. (However that was not the trigger)

furthermore, had there been an coincidential overlap, he would have said it there and then,

instead interacting with myself on how satisfied he was. And showing a different method
(flattened sphere as 2D) of fold/build.

I am also suspicious that he's bought twitter specifically to deny existence of an interaction as his "likes" section is what I relied on as communication.

There are also witnesses as well.

What he is doing is leveraging on the coincidence of the image. He should not have lied.

 

Matter of fact is that, he's tried to mislead our records of interaction MANY times.

Space escalator, 5/10, showing my first iterations only and not my later improvements.

While at other times, if it is advantageous for my attacker, showing only the later improvements. I recall this, if anyone remembers.

Moreover, the fact that he KNEW there was interaction with myself, automatically

gives him the understanding that no ideas of mine came after Steve. Otherwise, we would

have been in the realm of the counterfeit law/perjury since long ago and the crowd would

have commented on this.

 

So he, alongside the fact that he's the one who invited, permitted Steve after his mugging,

allowed this relentless attempts at theft. Clearly knowing the interaction between him and I.

 

 

They will create doubt. But facts do not lie.

It is clear that all my ideas were presented before Steve.

 

Please refer back to my writing on what to search for.

1. My writings improving on my own ideas. (Had there been issues stating an overlap, it would stop there and then. And no records of this will exist unless isolated misunderstanding or fabrication.)

2. Interaction between myself and Elon Musk, alongside his 'team' or acquaintances,
and my acquaintances, witnesses.

3. The fact that they are trying to mislead only in the now, when no such history o foverlap exists. This is clearly designed to exploit.

 

If there are other patterns I am unrecognizing as evidence, as I 'triangulate' an evidence

based on internal ecosystem of facts outside from their lies, please add to this.

I cannot see the channel so this is all I can help with at the moment.

 

It should be clear that this is about creating a witch hunt.

 

 

His research team at Tesla, if it existed, he's relayed individuals predominantly east-asian
as I recall, (photos of them) should reveal a lot as well.

Unless Elon was strictly working alone in order to mislead me, they should speak out as

witnesses (as well) as other individuals, his acquaintances. However, I can understand that

his mother and his brother may be against being witnesses as this is hurting their family.
But I am asking for the truth on the matter.

Unless he has misled them as well, but being that all was in public display, and situationally

impossible for ME to mislead, that is unlikely, and they should not lie.