everyday. trying not to die from a stroke, from anger/shock.

 

being framed.

 

 

pure evil.

 

-------------

got the cravings for buttered biscuits...

with milk.........

 

7 more days until. food.

 

--------------

seeing i've won.

 

told you.

------------

"Atreus gets sick."

Nope. No worries.

Please look into it closely.

 

the fact that they must be after i presented.

and correlating idea prior. no memory is a lie.

like all others.

 

is that simple.

as well as, my interaction w/ mr musk.

and its mannerisms then.

 

and following up on my defences and adapting to it.

everything is an evidence.

 

 

sorry but at this time, the "avengers" helping steve is unacceptable.

it means all they said to antagonize him was buying time until they can pounce on me,

until the opportunity presented itself.

 

this is called self-serving deceit. i told them to stay neutral.

they are not even in the timeline when i came up with the idea.

same goes for schwarzenegger, he bit of an idiot so. who knows what he says.

 

nobody should be supporting him, when you've seen what he's done in repeat,

nor were you there when i came up with the idea.

this is wishful thinking and choosing a side based on your bias.

wrong.

 

whatever it is that is resulting to my 'sickness',

will be figured out.

one merely needs to see the overall and the intent will be clear.

 

it is always an adaptation, a follow up. whatever its excuses.

please look into this. its own contradictions or inconsistencies as well.

 

 

going back to the moments when i came up with the idea,

and seeing the reactions from people then, would be good idea.

 

if steve was attempting theft then,

if that was prior to the space escalator, then the space courtyard for spaceships presented before as correlation, and mr musk being there for that matter, and its confession after the space escalator would confirm it.

 

if it was after the space escalator, the space escalator itself is about going into space.
it cannot possibly 'forget'.

so it's just forcing itself after the confession then, and nobody took it seriously.
as they should now.

and if it did, you may see mannerisms trying to pass as if it were a joke or confessions following.

 

its excuses are contradictions  to itself, when it follows up on my defense.

fidget spinners are something popular and common.  when the first time i presented my idea,  did it emphasize this as evidence? or was it only after i am stating its significance today?

it means it did not know where the principles came until i told it.

and was its so-called evidence just a browsing, a search? nope. everybody would do that.

 

whatever it is, one must think deeper and do not buy into its surface level creation of doubt.

 

and once again.

 

i cannot present anything someone else came up with,

without knowing what they presented in the channel.

 

how many times is this attempted theft and its been figured out?

this time is no different.

 

however, because i am using the principles of a popular item. a general interest may be used against me. this is why i said this person can become danger in the future as well.

statistically, ideas are derived from somewhere and interests can correlate.

and by the sheer number of ideas, it is inevitable something may crash.

however, here are the sheer number of ideas that was attempted theft and proven lies.

 

don't buy into any surface-level things.

 

i am worried it may have searched for a fidget spinner before. of which is what anyone would do. and use that against me. why i'm writing above. if the timeline is also near to when i was in the house beside him, then i must have spoken about making fidget spinners and selling them before like i did to Ray. part of the reason why i bought cnc machines and 3d printers.
i cannot remember if i did.

what is most important is that the fidget spinner is the key, the principles of the spherical spaceship. and that it did not mention this fact until i have prominently described its principles and where it came from. this would be the first thing it would be emphasizing had it been his. in fact, if it mentions the fidget spinner now all of a sudden, that proves its deceit. because it is following up on my description of my principles. please compare it to its previous excuses to my description. (on extending the circle of the fidget spinner and making it into a cylinder, and the ball bearing around it connecting two inner points that touches the cylinders from a sphere, and allowing it to rotate. and another sphere, bigger one enwraps around it, and so forth.) i doubt its excuses match my principles. that would have been the first thing it would say had it been his.

or anyone else for that matter. it was plainly there in the open, the word "fidget spinner" and yet they didn't use its principles to describe their attempts at theft, then you know they are lying. as well as the facts that they came ONLY after me. they must. it's my idea.

as well as the attitudes, silences, all must be seen during those times.

 

and that is where the idea comes from fidget spinners. just extend it in your mind with many focal points where it spins. two points holds a sphere, another two points wider holds a bigger sphere.

if anyone did not mention this as the principle are LYING. there are no other ways to interpret it.

see then its previous assertions of lies, attempts.

the timeline. behaviors.

my motivations. where it began, how it came to arrive at that idea.

 

random bogus assertions do not make it come true. it is attempting theft infinitely.

 

i try and get down to the molecular level of all things. XD (details)

so that is the bottom line. i say so with confidence unknowing what they said.

because i came up with the idea.

 

but there must be oter hints i cannot see, but must be present during those times in the interaction as well.

 

witnesses kindly look into those times when there isn't something mentioned...

 

i cannot be subjected to constant framing......