"doc holliday to hunt down johnny ringo"

if that is you Dan,

reading the Superman vs Zod relay,

yes, I get that Mr Musk is suicidal and I have asserted this idea before.

However, you should not be sympathetic to that because I am being framed for it.

That should not be.

Please simply tell the truth, and authorities will decide on his fair charges.

 

issue is that mr Musk appears to be relentless on his pursuit of destruction towards me.

for his selfish motives. he is not a simple thief like Steve. he has higher consciousness,

and this can't be about fame or fortune.

issue is because of his high intelligence, and tendencies, things can get diabolical.

and i can be in danger because of it...

but in this instance, i would say it was quite an obvious thing when you look into the past.

 

issue again is that he appears to have made me into an ultimate game.

you or me type of thing. Mr Musk... I hope you will stop.

 

been a long time, so may be hard to remember. hope you can help Dan.

 

"they lie! wake up!"

what are they lying about now.

 

 

"w(oo)d milk." Ms Aubrey Plaza. Are you calling me fake?

you got it wrong. very wrong.

 

sorry if i got that relay wrong however.

i am being very honest about my ideas.

 

every idea is mine. unlike wood milk.

it is produced directly from my mind. :P

 

--------

yeah, i think Dan is right. Mr Musk is suicidal...

I should think this from a deeper perspective.

he can't be that shallow...

 

but mr Musk. you targeting me and my life is still unforgivable.

 

------------

 

"beware of people playing the victim."

.........i really am the victim you dumb people whoever says this.

 

i got shoved into this situation and i tried my best.

now they are trying to take by framing.

and people should know that,

the victim cannot possibly risk himself and present something that is stolen.

when he has no clue what was presented before himself.

among many other reasons.

 

 

 

 

-----------

umm... if mr musk tried to steal my idea on the spherical ship.

it means i stole the idea from him right?

then question. how will i be able to see it in the first place?

i don't have access to the channel,

and relays are very limited.

not to mention the progress of development,

and our interactions in development, communication.

 

it doesn't make sense does it?

 

Steve is more tricky but if you look into the details as i've written before,

you will see inconsistencies and even contradictions.

certainly unreasonable 'forgetfulness' as well.

it is only following up shameless.

 

 

"guardians if the multiverse" vs ultron.

 

you the avengers cast have been supporting this criminal every chance you got.

 

you've created bias and suporting him based on prejudice.

 

it must be.

 

you should be charged. you should be staying neutral after all that.

 

 

-----

 

all that needs to be done about steve,

is someone yelling out he's been following-up after my idea,

and that his excuses in detail is inconsistent to the principles,

and all his other attempts at shameless framing.

 

if there are additional factors i can't see, if anyone can look into what he's said back then,

when i came up with it and working with mr musk.

 

also, Steve is postulating the idea that whatever he tried to steal from me,

his stance still stands alongside the spherical ship idea, right?

What do you think that means when some of them are blatantly obvious lies?

It is then absorbed into the whole of the lies, as well as the details.

 

It just brazens itself into a zero-sum game.

And that must be regarded as an intent to take, as well as to kill.

It's all or nothing. And that should make NO SENSE.

 

its intent is clear. it is figured out. it is part of the whole.

they are all bogus lies.

 

"as well as the details" in its complete inconsistencies, misleading constantly.

 

 

so once again. i would like to clarify.

every idea is truly mine.

i cannot risk myself as these people are doing.

you are seeing me working. there are no misleads.

 

 

 

and i find it shocking,

and loathing at the same time,

that despite ALL that Steve has done.

You STILL give him chances, and choose to react to support him instantly,

as if you were waiting.

and you were.

what is deeply in embedded in you to wanting to antagonize me?

 

that you're not even giving it deeper thought, time.

 

character do not change. he is something vain and lethal.

it doesn't have any conscience. it only feigns it.

please try and believe that.

not just my 'opinion'.

you should know by now.

 

talking to the supporters.

wake up.

 

and i'm thinking there must be a confession to the spherical ship from Steve somewhere back then. if i can recall, did i briefly fight him and he receded?

was this after the space escalator?

if it was before the space escalator it becomes absorbed into the confession that follows.

actually, everything is absorbed into that confession. it was confessing there was nothing

between he and i.

well i can't remember that well at this point, maybe i assumed he wouldn't dare steal this idea and just went forward.

but if anyone can kindly check what steve's written during those times that can be of use.

though i'm sure it is already clear.

 

 

or i was thinking people must understand him as a joke after that confession.

maybe ignored. i can't remember now.

 

what i do know, my ideas are my own. i came up with it during this competition, period.

and this Steve is a scammer who is after my life.

 

and let me guess, every single time, without much thought,

some of you just look at the screen, and momentarily 'believe' into antagonzing me,

and acting on it.

when you don't care to research and summarize instantly in your mind by your prejudice and speculation.

 

and in fear of that, i can't write anything.

because i might just trigger that antagonization by your impulse.

 

yeah. think deeper.

 

 

..........bunch of savages.... hahahaha

 

 

 

if you just look into the details with patience people,

you will know all he says are lies.

this 'person' is worst of the worst.

 

 

 

as for the idiots supporting him,

no, we've givem them many, many chances.

they are supporting a criminal, and based on presumably, very shallow reasoning, or 'evidence'.

when they know i can't present something without risking myself.

it must be something shallow and inconclusive.

but if their attitude is defamation then,

without neutrality. that is then propaganda.

your intent... depends on your expressions and how strong it is.