Waking up at about 5am...

 

I hate to mention this over and over again, but in case anything is diluted.

On Adam and Zuckerberg.

They should have sent me the link to the channel, or properly communicated to in text,

instead passive messages. When I asked for help to Adam. When the authorities were not believing me and I had no evidence. Though no help came from anyone, so in my 'defeat',

I said he didn't have to. But who else was there? I should have been helped back then.

Adam held the key, of observation of comments, exchange of communication between me and Anna and the gang. That was the proof, and he was silent as the abuse went on.

Did he say it was to side with Anna? When I needed fair defense?

That is all wrong.

While giving me an opportunity for investment as a trade-off, to the abuse?

And I, while having worked hard for this starting with the presentation.

Zuckerberg hiding the process, what was submitted even after the presentation, what was needed for the website,

and he took my idea? Did Adam know about this? Why was he silent?

What about the times origins of the presentation was in question?

That I was accused of spamming fronting Anna, while I was hacked by Anna and I was trying to send the presentation to Adam privately by mail?

All this...

 

 

I believe that when Biden and his administration came up, both Adam and Zuckerberg were fronting their power, to subjugate my rights. So in believing in their force, they asserted force on to me as well alongside them. When they should have been doing the right thing, they went along with that power. So in this case, they weren't independant. They were involved politically.

This is not an accusation. From the excuse Zuckerberg made previously if I am correct,
on a foreigner coming into the country, political assertions were made.  

This is my guess. Situationally, this most likely is correct.

 

Hence among many reasons, Biden's actions were lethal. It created a string of followers trying to exploit this situation. Though each and every one of their actions were their fault, following or not. (Others are different where if it started from Canada, that is personal)

It means, Biden created unnecessary casualty using force, because others followed singularly believing in that force.