and again,

their reasons must be forced perspective,

but importantly,

 

I am in Canada.

And the States has no jurisdiction to what is my affairs made in this country.

I would be subjected to the laws here. :|

 

Unless I physically moved over there and committed crimes that is.

At least in the matters of what is "hush money".

What this is about I have no idea.

I do things based on believing that I am making the correct choice by the law.

What is fair by the law as well.

 

Sometimes I may hit and miss, but either the law or myself would correct it.

But all within the realm of the law.

I am in public display. What else?

 

 

 

On Steve, what he did, could've been toward anyone.

That is his objective motives were about exploitation,

by prejudice and violence.

The give and take is incorrect and lethal by nature.

How do you find it okay for this person to be simply serving time,

when its actions towards me have been lethal?

Aiming to kill by framing?

And let me guess, you let others go as well, correct?

I am seeing Sean Kernan and others, framing me, to kill me,

they were let go.

So there is certainly lopsided advantages towards my attackers,

and dimissing my suffering or danger that follows.

After all that.

Why change now?

They were convicted before.

Why now?

Even as, for Steve, its crime just expands?

 

There is corruption here. It's not an accusation.

It's an observable fact.

 

How does the crimes become diminished of charges,

as it relentlessly GROWS?

 

See the last 3 months, the variations of lethal harm from Steve,

it GREW to the point of life and death.

 

And you decide to let go of its charges made before?

When it should be amplified?

 

So this is my observable fact.

I hope you will see my perspective in this.

This is incorrect.

 

 

And you keep insinuating the capital punishment on to me?

Under what what motivation, or right, do you think you have on this?

 

I don't know if this judge is the one from previous.

But it seems like to me, this person is exercising his powers to his preference,

rather than judging the right and wrong.

 

Isn't what I am stating correct?

 

 

Seeing Rachel Weisz and Brenden Frasier on the relay with "too loud!"

Damn right it has to be loud.

All my suffering, their attempt to kill.

They're letting them go.

 

 

IF I am allowed to make a proposition.

Since Anna, Becky, Robert, Sean, does not pose further threats.

Though what they've done, even after forgiveness,

even after attempting to save them from capital punishment,

is inexcusable. I will settle with their incarceration, with Robert,

getting the most punishment of them all.

That is,

in exchange for,

Steve's capital punishment.

As Steve, is something that of madness.

It is not something that will cease.

And that will cause danger as a cycle of harm.

I do not want to fall into that trap of hatred. But it will continue to provoke me.

 

If that exchange is immoral to suggest,

then take it as logic.

 

But what this thing has done in the last 3 months,

it only solidified its previous charges.

If the brother wasn't involved in everything it did,

then there is a chance for escape from capital punishment.

But that certainly should not be Steve.

I do not say this from any competitive stance of intellectual anything.

I was never against a person's growth.

I am talking about the relentless harm it insists.

And I am worried about my own state of mind, and the choice I may follow as well.

It will try and destroy my life, however it can.

 

 

 

 

Seeing the "John Constantine" relay,

With the character "Gabriel" stating John has done everything for himself.

Is that so?

Even as I tried making sacrifices to save people?

People who done harm?

Who the hell are you to judge me this way?

Who the fuck is this?!

 

 

 

And note that even if these people,

that is Anna, Becky, Robert, Sean,

gets away.

There is good chance that they will attempt something again.

And when it does, that should be enter into capital punishment.

 

You must understand,

your choices in letting them go,

means my danger.

 

My forfeit of freedom from safety and sanity.

 

What they were, was relentless.

 

And it was UNNECESSARY.

 

Do you understand this concept?

And yet you people make me into the villain constantly.

 

Victim blaming.

No. That never was a choice.

 

 

The law I believe counts intent of harm that will never cease.

Above all else, this is Steve.

What this means is that capital punishment or not,

it just may result in death anyway.

But this time, you will take me along with him by the law.

If you let him go.

In my perspective, it is endless danger. Endless torture.

It is self-defense to end this person's life.

I have done nothing to this person to deserve THIS.

That is how cycle works if there is no justice.

 

And whose fault is this?

It is the one that is rabid, on pursuit of lethal harm, relentlessly.

And the people who refuses to acknowledge this fact.

 

*I say Robert getting the most punishment, in speculation that it was his lead

and idea to enter the facility fronting Sean. And Sean agreed to it.

And this is as Sean was making threats through the upvotes. (Fish in a briefcase).

I tried saving them from capital punishment even after this.

Prior, dropping charges on cyberattacks.

But they framed me to kill me following.

I *suggest this 'exchange' or logic again. Because though there is clear danger

of them repeating in some form. It isn't relentless, as with someone like Steve.

That is rabid. And I hope these idiots will stop in the future as well.

I don't know the law, and what is fair, but I can suggest punishment.

20 years, for Anna, Becky, Sean. For i've suggested 10 years after their initial

attempt. Then they went on framing.

Life imprisonment, for Robert. If he was the lead.