Oi.... I hope Mr Petersen isn't antagonizing me.

Weird relays I am reading. Psychopath and all that...

 

Mr Petersen, while I can get violent.

It would never be without reason.

And that reason, wouldn't be self-justified as you are saying in another video,

like, bad childhood and things relating to my past.

 

I have a sense of give and take...

I have a sense of honor.

So please, don't get the wrong idea of me.

 

 

Let me just say one thing.

I have never stolen an idea from Steve.

Not one idea.

I have never collaborated any ideas from Steve.

In the house, there was nothing. Blank.

And he left.

 

Anything this person is saying to antagonize this,

is complete, blatant, lie.

And it is in your every right to investigate,

interrogate, and observe in accordance to the timeline,

compare, and see its motives and behavior.

 

 

I have a sense of fairness in business.

I would never take someone's intellectual property.

All the ideas, are something that I have came up with, alone.

 

Authorities must recognize that,

this is relentless PURSUIT of harm.

It is unending.

And level of harm, is lethal, by nature.

In all areas.

 

Maybe it is fair to suggest,

if you are not going to end up in capital punishment for this person.

Since his crimes are something that is between us, as countries.

Vice-versa,

that you hand him over to us.

So all his crimes should be counted for, and he should end up in prison for life.

 

 

I am reading, "the multiverse is real" by "David Deutsch".

If this is David insurrecting,

this is based on his prejudice and speculation.

This person, I believe has been trying to dilute Steve's actions

with his own. To lessen the perceived value of his crimes.

It has been helping this person, as I have mentioned since long ago.

There is no reason for it but it thinks it is saving his life.

And that makes you my enemy. Remember that.

Whichever way.

 

Understand, my ideas are my own.

I would give fair credit if anything was asserted by him.

 

 

Reading again this "fermi paradox" with "David Deutsch".

I am looking up its meaning.

No. As it always has, it is there to create doubt.

And seeing from Kevin Yue's relay earlier,

 

"the funniest thing about the disney live-action remakes is that

they want nostalgia soundtracks but also need to sneak in an

original song for oscar qualification. So it'll be five or six familiar

musical numbers and then suddenly in the middle, the worst song you've ever

heard."

 

Steve is then following up on my principles, to create variations.

You must see the timeline in which this person has come up with,

how many. It's not an statistical anomaly. It is impossible.

More importantly, again. Mugging and confession was there.

It simply regretted its actions and pushed forward since then I believe.

 

On my end, I am always trying to come up with something. That is it.

I have never collaborated any ideas with Steve, nor did I steal it.

What I say in the emails to him, is the only exchange, and what happened

in the house. Mugging and confession is the evidence of that.

 

Please do not further help create doubt. Please have it simply

enter the lie detector test. All these series of abandon, there cannot be an

error of ambiguity. Every idea that it states as his, is a lie that you can detect.

 

 

 

As for David, judging by his personality,

this person believes, what it wants to believe.

And that is based on its own speculation.

It is something that violates into the person.

So this person should have charged as well.

 

 

 

Once again.

1. Look into the emails, and the interaction. There never was any business, if there were, there would have been exchanges. The content also states that there never were.

2. I am saying endlessly. I would never suggest an idea on the public, if it were his.  When I cannot see the channel. If it has presented anything prior to I, that is limited markets in which it just tapped into following my other relating ideas. It would be a coincidence.

 

(*See if my principles were used on its new markets as well. If I suggested for instance, parachutes for flying jumbo motorcyle or the plane, if i've suggested it prior and it just carried this into a new market I haven't tried out yet. In helicopters.)

 

3. How many ideas? It seems like this was going on for quite a while. It is impossible. See the time-frame in the emails, between when I am stating I am writing the presentation and the moment it leaves the house.

what else....

4. This thing is just giving me an incredible headache. Just can you please just make it go through the lie detector test? I should not be subjected to this endless repeating abuse and framing.

It has done this before. Are you then saying, I am using its previous crimes, so that I use its tainted character so I suddenly turn the table around by presenting stolen ideas from him? (Since after confession)

No way. My ideas are my own. And I just wanted fair punishment on him.

I am busy focusing on my own ideas. It is impossible it doesn't state itself prior to those ideas. Whatever numbers that may be. It seems to be many.

It is impossible.

It would have said it in the confession as well, whatever the content may be.

 

 

It seems like it is recycling my principles and entering into relating markets, or hijacking into my ideas by creating variations of its own, FOLLOWING my ideas.

It is a scumbag.

I am behind this screen, just trying my best to come up with new ideas and get investment/rewards. As it comes to me. You can see the process in real-time.

Headache. Headache.

 

It's endless pursuit of harm without any integrity or remorse, or conscience. Nothing.

It's not temporary. It just goes on.

Something has to be done about this.