Seeing Zuckerberg's thumbnail with a title that says

"open sourcing AGI."

I hope you're not saying, to take the rights of my idea

and suggesting it to make it opensource.

That is not in your right.

 

It is my belief that, when there are so few competitors in the market

as dominant generative A.I,

and if my idea was not asserted by anyone prior,

I was the first to point it out,

and when that is the tipping point for the next level of generative A.I,

for tangible output.

Then it is worthy of credit.

 

I will leave it to the authorities to decide,

but you should not suggest opensource on behalf of me, if you are.

 

If my idea was an inevitability,

so are all generative A.I.

But not all generative A.I is non-profit is it?

And since nobody else pointed it out and developed it,

only after I had mentioned it,

then I too, have the right to profit from it.

If there are so few dominant generative A.I competing in the market,

and if my idea is indeed a game-changer then.

It should be credited.