He appears to be getting away by forced technicality.

But again, all these things indicate lack of morality.

And that is what the law should be judging him for.

 

Exploitation because of lack of morality.

 

Because that is, what it is.

 

1. Deliberate criminal negligence.

2. Setting me in danger by leading a mob, working with the authorities,
which is completely unnecessary, nor should he have accepted their offer of being hired.

3. Harassment that was unnecessary through the shares.

4. Hijacking my ideas, which should be interpreted as illegal move by the merit of the competition itself, as it continue to  build on it, my idea. The competitor's idea.

 

And as it gloats.

 

What do you see?

 

 

That all this is coincidence? That he has the right to get away by exploiting technicalities?

This is about his character and how he exploits it covering himself with the mask of 'incorrect' law.

And he is fully aware of his actions.

He has been targeting, and this should not have been allowed. And this was by his will as well.