I have forgotten what I wrote about her last time.

It must have been something that related to the relays.

So I think my last statement was more correct.

She was aiming at my life.

And also that may follow treason, knowing the money involved.

 

 

I'll leave it up to the law for the correct punishment.

I can't see exactly what she is doing.

I hardly know this person.

I get a bad vibe, like forcing insurrection from her,

and that is the one of the possible thing she could be doing,

and whatever that she is crossing the line with that propaganda.

 

Wait a minute, so if she was insinuating that it was a love triangle,

and THEN she accused me of theft following,

and she knows that there is no love triangle,

that I hardly know her.

Then that is blatant attempt to take my life.

Because the latter is built up on from that slander.

Which then means she is amplifying that slander  in order to take my life.

So that is intended murder(?) isn't it?

Those two are not separate things.

She is not accusing me of theft by her ignorance alone.

It means she wanted harm.

Because it came with the slander.

It was intended harm,

and knowing its outcome, that is intended attempt to murder.

(?)

Slightly confused here, I need sleep,

but I think I am correct....

 

 

So unless she can substantiate her claims of a love triangle,

her intent as a whole, must come to effect as charges.

Maybe in the lawful terms, that is,

Insurrection by usage of slander, in order to destroy the opponent.

It's not insurrection by prejudice.