It's also kind of funny the competitor himself is the judge for my ideas (Elon Musk)

when he obviously has a emotional attachment to these things and constantly

tries to lessen credit or goes on victim blaming...

 

Any other qualified individuals who has more positive perspectives?

They should work with him and antagonize his forced criticism to his benefit. XD

 

You know Mr Musk. First, always be transparent about what i've written.

Never hide. Everything.

Second, if there are roadblocks, it can most likely be countered.

Thirdly, give fair credit to the principles. I have earlier seen the "beef stew" relay

from Kevin Yue, that people are just using my foundations and replacing myself.

Credit belongs to myself for initiation. I am the foundation, kindly remember.

 

And, with partnership of existing technologies in mind, as does the products from Tesla,

my ideas should be looked over again and given fair credit instead dismissing or diminishing

its potential. If it's an access to the industry, benefit people and will make profit, it simply is.

 

 

I get the feeling that people are turning this into a intellectual battle,

rather than access to industries/markets for investment.

Then why not completely focus on science?

Other places that requires discoveries instead development?

 

This is why the principles of this competition is flawed to their excuses.

If someone who has the better skills, like Adam, in that specific area,

builds up on someone else's idea and tries to claim it as his,

that should not be allowed.

 

*If i'm not confused, this reasoning could be correct. If you know what i'm talking about. :)