Dan. Stop trying to get me driven.

I'll work when I can, and that is near.

 

Further. Stop trying to affect my mind.

You are not trusted. Not always.

 

Watch Steve's movements now.

He will repeat the same again,

in order to dilute his initial intent like as if it were nothing/a cruel joke.

But it is not.

 

This repeated the same with the initial attempt at mugging.

Please charge him at the height of the crime.

Which is initiation when there are new judges,

exploiting their lack of history.

 

 

As for "Laura" if supporting Steve in unjustifiable ways,

based her own perspective/experience and justifying his crimes somehow,

that would fall in the category of insurrection from the eyes of the victim,

and hence the court. So Canadian authorities should be on the lookout for this.

At this point in time, 'support' in such a way that Steve's actions are justified in moral

sense should be out of the question.

 

Watch what you say and how you say things, kindly.

One should not be supporting a criminal like this.

 

Understand that helping him means you are helping someone who is trying to relentlessly destroy me.

I can't abide by that.

 

As for David, this person is attaching himself to my life constantly.

I have more *than enough told him to stop.

It doesn't fall in freedom of speech, knowing where he comes from.

It is all part of stalking. He should be charged for escalation.

Since he won't stop, just keep an eye on his behavior until the time comes for punishment.

 

Excuse my grammar people. You know what I mean.

 

He may assert himself as a type of insurrection by prejudice as well.

Constantly observing and trying to look for a way. Whichever way, he should not be stalking.

From where this person is from.