Again, I don't know what the punishment is nor do I have any control over it.

 

It is up to the law.

 

However, it is only fair to assume.

 

when the outcome, the tangible effect of their crimes was intended to manifest as my destruction.

 

When you dismiss that attempt to kill, or destroy by subjugation.

 

You are essentially on their side.

 

For if I had done the same on to them, what would have been the result?

 

And yet I am seeing everyone will be let go?

 

 

No. There was tangibility to all this,

 

and it could have come to effect.

 

And that is as they intended.

 

 

Then that 'tangibility' must be taken into account.

 

All that was done in the mass, leveraging their way into destruction aiming public perception and exploiting my being in the blind, vulnerable,

 

only amplifies their crimes.

 

And yet, it looks like you are flipping this perspective.

 

No. If anything, their crimes are amplified. This isn't done on a local level. It is lasting, permanent. And prone to trigger, destruction.

 

 

Who is you to let them go, when they tried taking my life, over and over again.

 

Who is you to dismiss their crimes, when installation of fear by subjugation following mugging,

 

by the prejudice of sexual orientation, and persisting to change public perspective proceeds,

 

when the laws are clear on what is severe a crime? Why do those laws exist?

 

 

Apologies if that isn't the authorities intent.

 

But they can't be let go.