See also speculated intent. If say he was let go,

will this person have any intent to stop?

No. It will persist on that variations of attacks.

Then you can also deduce that that was is its intent since the beginning.

Timing in which this person is claiming whatever excuse is in the now

is but an adaptation to get out of the punishment he is in.

See also the contradictions from prior. It would be hinted in most everything he says.

If not direct contradictions.

 

 

"The justice league reunites to put a stop to brainacs invasion".

You are the ones who invaded us.

And I/we are in defense.

This is why your fight is futile.

Your actions are crimes.

 

Keep seeing "I got beat up in the alley" by "Steve Rogers".

1. No such thing has happened. If he is insinuating this.

2. I think if he is, he is exploiting the fact that I challenged him to a fight because of his continued abuse in the house. Which was dismantled when he said it was an misunderstanding. And I apologized. But I still didn't trust him so I sent those emails as records.

3. I recall saying when Steve talked about his martial arts past, I said "wow, and I asked/going to fight you. glad I didn't." (something like this)

4. If there is exploitation, let us imagine that something like that has happened.
It would've been a fair fight, at a challenge, in response to the abuse he initiated and continued. (There never was any physical fight) Then following, the ending, as shown on the emails, would indicate civility nonetheless. That would have been in the past.

5. So in that essence, the NATURE of what Steve has done with his brother, HOW it approached harm STILL REMAINS THE SAME. Attacks by prejudice and bias, and exploiting that prejudice with violence and subjugation in an attempt to mug, theft. And when it confessed it was a lie, that it didn't come up with my ideas, did it come up with this excuse then? No. I do not think so. Because it is a LIE.

My point is, even if there was a physical fight, the honor system would be present with me.
Whereas he, was about absolute violation and exploitation, based on prejudice and installation of fear for purposes of mugging, theft. The two doesn't correlate either.

So please stop buying into these excuses. If there is. It's a lie.