One more thing.

 

If I was recorded by video, when I was running in the snow.

I believe those were during the times Steve was present in the house, in North York.

Then, if I had fought Steve, physically, this would have been captured in camera somewhere.

But I have never fought him physically.

So he is lying if he is saying so.

 

See when the camera monitoring began, and when he moved out of the house.

I was followed everywhere by the camera then.

He is blatantly lying.

 

And secondly, no. Its actions are not involuntary. Are you kidding me?

This isn't tourettes.

This persisted for years, every single day. With pre-meditated factors.

All was obviously a conscious choice of its own reasoning stating why it must do so,

with its own "sovereignity".

 

First, there was no fight. I saw a man fighting a fake bear doing "Kung fu" on the relay.

It says never fight a bear who knows Kung fu.

I have never fought this person physically. Nor do I know Kung fu. Only briefly attended classes with my friends as a kid. I don't know anything LOL. I think I lied to my friends I know a thing or two as a kid. XD

I specifically remember saying, "Wow and I was going to fight you. Glad I didn't." When Steve was talking about its history with martial arts.

If that had happened, that would have been the best card he would have had. It would've been used since the beginning.

But did it even retaliate when I spoke the truth long time ago? That I challenged him to a
fight but it was dismantled there and then with an apology? No it didn't.

Only when I said it again now, and it's using that as an leverage. So please do not buy into it.

The court is based on evidence.

 

You must dismiss these two claims:

1. I have never fought this person physically, that would've been the topic of discussion if it had.

2. His medical condition is no excuse for pre-meditated and on-going pursuit of harm with conscious reasoning.

Both these factors are adaptations to get out of what it did.

He must be charged.

 

Note that even #1 was true, it still would've been in reasonable grounds. As this means that
he is fighting accepting the fact that he is being abusive. I have never fought him physically.
Instead, as you can see from the email exchanges, I am leaving records every time he does so.

And see how it ends. It ends in civility. If to be bringing up such an excuse for impossible violence with his brother, which does not correlate at all to its claims of a fight.

Which is about gay slurs, and subjugation, and following mugging.

He still must be charged. There is absolutely no evidence as to myself fighting him physically,

even during the monitoring, because it has not happened.

 

This is a low-life, opportunistic, and doing whatever it can to harm, while it creates excuses for its actions.

 

I attended Tae Kwon do and Judo classes as a kid. And not for long. I don't know how to fight

first of all. And most importantly, I have never fought this person physically.

Never Kung fu. Run on sentence there.

 

 

Steve is just adapting. It's a complete lie.

Had we fought physically, then it would've ended in another fight again.

As you can see from the email exchanges, he does so in infinte loops.

I only retaliate by sending him emails and pointing it out.

I only challenged him once, only for him to back out, and I apologized as well.

 

This is serious. This is called FRAMING.

So you must come to a conclusion.

It also means that had I fought him, physically, it means that I am framing HIM.

And I am NOT.

And I am not worried because there never was a physical fight.

 

I have, as a reaction to his abusive behavior, intimidated him by words perhaps, and expressions, but never have I laid a finger on this person.

And what he's done and doing, does NOT justify his actions.

Tell the fucking truth Steve.

 

He has used slander repeatedly before as well, and speaking in abandon/vanity.

All evidence will point to his malice. Again.

These are serious charges. Framing someone.

I have not fought this person physically, period.

 

Tell the fucking truth Steve.

 

 

This framing must backfire on him. Please understand. That is only fair.

It is impossible pursuit of harm. I have had enough of this.

 

I have stated all my reasons, you have more than enough to arrive to an conclusion.  

This person is a lying scumbag.

 

 

 

Earlier I saw thumbnail clips, as I mentioned, some time ago about "I could have been raped."

If this was insinuated by Steve (XD) you can see that this is also a contradiction to what he says now, and it is one that of vanity, abandon.

This person is full of malice.

And I have done nothing to this person to deserve all this. No.

It is all about him.