Okay. Seeing Kevin Yue's relay, if that is about me.

This trans stuff. XD.

That's enough. STOP.

I am stating who I am, which is a straight person.

And from the relays it says I am a narcissist.

I am not. I have confidence issues, social anxiety.

To state otherwise is asserting your will on myself.

That is called prejudice. STOP.

 

I may be anti-social, that is probably true.

I wouldn't go as far as borderline, but I can be dramatic.

That is probably because of way I was raised with abuse and trauma.

But I am not a narcissist.

 

Do you like going on witch hunts? What is your aim?

There must be something that you want to correlate as effect.

Again, you are delving into the WRONG areas.

Differentiate between what is perspective and what is truth.

To force your perspective is insurrection. Understand this.

 

Fucking Biden constantly pushing forward for some kind of push on prejudice,

based on nothing. NOTHING. And he even alters it to his will.

Forcing perspectives to your will, when the victim states otherwise.

There is the evil in it. You are fucking deceitful SNAKE. REMEMBER THAT.

 

Bring about my previous defense, and where you should correlate this, their intent of

insurrection is with other insurrections, this or other person has attempted prior.

When you see the nature of these people, you already know what they are doing.

 

What is a matter of perspective, is a perspective BECAUSE there are obvious

contradictions to what you say. Isn't there?

So what you CHOOSE to believe, is with an aim. A goal in effect.

To your ADVANTAGE. You FORCE that on others.

And THAT is coming from your intent.  

I am sick and tired of this.

 

Watch what you say. There are many pespectives in the world,

per person. But to assert that only YOUR perspective is the correct one.

Is by prejudice.

Not a matter of belief. But contradicting FACTS.

Understand the difference.

 

And one more thing, I am trolling quite a bit with my jokes.

Please do not paint me as LGBTQ or gay/bi, something in this arena.

Some of us who aspire to be funny/comedian,

we joke in a self-deprecating manner.

However, this does not correlate with who we are, and what we want.

It's absolute just showmanship.

Is that what is going on?

 

Stop trying to exploit technicality of things, just because jokes are present.

Words are words.

 

My comedy, as I aspire to... Is quite obscene. I learned and mimicked, (hopefully)

something close to what is portrayed with "Key and Peele". Twisted in my own way.

But know that, that is not myself. XD

 

 

And precisely, because of this creating doubt by someone like Steve,

and several who followed.

if the senator himself as I am seeing by the relays, "I don't believe you."

Is present. That is what spells danger.  That is what they aimed for.

It is not matter of belief, senator. I am who I am, and there is no deviation to that.

Please do not fall into prejudice. I apologize if I am getting this relay wrong.

I would not be on pursuit of women, if I were gay/bi or LGBTQ.

 

 

And I feel extremely uncomfortable defending myself like this again and again by the way.

I can't recognize my identity as portrayed in the public anymore.

See how I grew up until high school. People remember me not in that way.

Nor do most who has met me in person.

And see their prejudice, where it is stemming from. If it has a absolution to it,
or if it is based on prejudice. Over that is nothing, or speculation.

And I know these people like Steve and David, to an extent. These people are about force,
prejudice, exploitation of that.

 

And if Senator, if you have developed a prejudice, I can see why.

There are many trying to paint me in this way.

I can also see from your accent, where you are coming from.

But please do understand, my generation, and my 'flair' in comedy/perspectives,

is different from your fixed perspective of perhaps the definition of masculinity.

I need not show and express toughness constantly, in order to prove that I am.

 I apologize about the speculation through the relays on you Senator, if this isn't

what is going on.

 

 There are some things that should not be in debate at all.

Something that is pointless, and simply harming.

Do not discuss what I am when I am stating otherwise.

Bottom line, and I can't believe I am saying this.

If anyone believes that I had physical intimacy with a man. (HOLY FUCK)

THEN accuse me of being gay/bi. Alright?

 

You fucking witch hunting idiots.

 

And this also doesn't mean I beat up Steve.

This fucker exploits to left and right.

 

In days like this...

I feel the need to express my sexual desires for women...

But it is inappropriate.

And hence, I will restrain.

 

Unrelated,

I can no longer make mangina jokes on Mr Musk as well...

For he really possibly is bi. Then it is not funny anymore.  

And considering he is in trouble with the law constantly abusive...

 

 

Ah. Another determining evidence.

See all these years, my internet history.

Watching pornographic materials.

See if ANY of it was gay porn.

And there you go.

 

And by "all those years" I mean check the nearly decade of time alone in self-isolation

after high school. Not in public display.

Then you can read my thoughts.

 

And this proof was asserted before. But yet these people still force their prejudice,

by what intent, and what aim?

 

Please understand, it is insurrection.

 

 

These people took it as an opportunity, a chance, to destroy my life in every aspect.

They have clearly showed predatory behavior for their ultimate goals.

How can that be let go?

The tangibility of effect, was not on a local level, but global.

Aiming not only my rights, as a person, as a human being, as  a defendant, as an business partner.

But they aimed for my life itself, to take my life, as well. Did they not?

So how can this be dismissed?

They must be charged for their actions.

As you can see, I am a victim in all this, by their violation, by their force. By their abuse.

 

hmm... Judging by the relays, Prince Harry is antagonizing myself...

I fear his vindictive powers... It may possibly have something to do with him being a ginger as well...

Know this. I mean well for your family. Not ill.

 

 

By the way, if Steve is stating any injuries that was addressed by a hospital, if I am getting

the relays correctly. Please check to see if it is before 2019, May 15th. Which is the day

I bought my CNC machine and brought it downstairs asking permission from Cesar and Robert, Steve for an approval on joint-usage. As it would be loud in my room (which was upstairs)

Meaning, I was not downstairs during those times. This was few months or weeks after I bought the CNC machine.

I have not fought this person Steve, physically, at all. Please recognize this.

He is misleading. There must have been contradictions.

And if he was treated for an injury, there must have been communication to the hospital

on where that injury was from and how.

If he is indeed stating that I have fought him physically, it is a complete lie.

Please do not believe in accordance, and correspondance to, his previous misleads.

Whichever he stated as records. I have spoken before that I have made a challenge

which was turned down as misunderstanding, what was his response then.

This person is just constantly trying to destroy my life since the beginning.

And I did not deserve this. Soured friendship or not, it was within reason, civility,
and in many cases, I was a nice person.

 

 

Oh yeah, this reminds me, I forgot to return the Dana wireless devices (writing devices) to Amazon. They misled the advertisement with it having a charger, CDs, manuals, and sleeves for it, and looking new.  Arrived used, and when asked of it, they said, it doesn't need a charger because it uses batteries. I can't remember clearly what happened afterwards,
I think they sent a refund. Without requesting the items back. So I asked the customer service, if I can keep it, and they checked the account and said, "I guess so, ok." So I took it as an apology. I asked the customer service kind of confused on how to contact them again, because it goes through a filter in chat. You leave a message and wasn't sure I don't think they reply to that  or if I was talking to the customer service. Later I confirmed and ask them again.
After purchasing for a second time. Not wanting the wireless version (because I keep getting hacked) so I asked them directly, and first they said to return the devices, and then just told me to keep it. (The sellers themselves told me to keep it) so I kept it. But still, it felt wrong,
so I said I will return it in public display. I put it in a box somewhere, and I had forgotten about it. I should have sent it back when I had enough money. I will for sure this coming month.  Do understand, if I had intent of malice, I wouldn't be buying the same device the second time from them after the refund. XD So responding to Kevin Yue's relay on this. I think.

Kevin Yue, thanks for your relays man. I appreciate it. If I got this wrong, I hope someone finds something more closer to it. They are attacking me in every corner it seems...

 

Now kindly look for attempting to 'turn the table around' by whomever convicted.

When to get to the details, and my previous defense, (which is most likely hidden)

you will know that if that is going on, they are trying to frame me.

Kindly recognize, my being in this situation, I cannot possibly be harm to anyone.

If there was inappropriateness, or misconduct, it would never, ever be an excuse
for their lethal intent.

Not to mention, I make my apologies if I was a bit overboard.

And that is the worst that can happen from me.

 

So they will most likely be forcing reasons by prejudice or framing. Attempting insurrection

by self-reasoning or deviating away from the truth.

 

 

Essentially:

1. They know that I am in the blind. And they have a history of exploiting this.
This is likely be another attempt. To use the situation in the blind.

2. There is no possibility of myself capable of asserting tangible harm.
Nothing.

So with these principles in mind, please look into it.

Then you will find something that will result in their charges. Most likely.

 

I cannot make defense as to what I cannot see.

And they well knows this.

 

And again, what Adam did, being 'in my spot' (I am seeing Howard from Big bang theory in Sheldon's spot)

was hijacking. This fucker means ill. Following up on my work in a competitive environment,

where intellectual property and credit is being given to the person who came up with the idea,

and the investor and their team is to follow up on the building, the development of it.

If this fucker decides to build up on my idea, then it should be investing into it. And giving me SHARES.

Am I not correct?

And I said specifically I don't want to work with this person.

And yet it constantly attaches itself to my ideas and continues.

Please charge this person. Alongside all the other things he has done and getting away with some technicality.

 

If there is no honor system in a competitive environment, and no rules.

Rules which was clearly set.

This person can technically steal ANY software related ideas. And get away with it.

But that's not how it works.

We are attempting BUSINESS. and he is hijacking into it. My ideas.

 

I told you to stay the fuck away from my life Adam.

This is a stalker. Another variation of 'alpha and the omega'

and keeps on at it. without REMORSE.

It means ill. It means HARM.

It stays quiet when I need help. Deliberately. (Why can't you see this?)

And it attempts to take credit and assert itself into my life, my ideas.

 

Just ask. Why is it difficult for this fucker to just LET GO?

 

Why does it keep attaching itself to my life and my ideas?

While it deliberately keeps quiet of the origins when I need help?

 

It continues, BECAUSE it is a great idea.

And by that value alone, in this competitive environment that is to be expected as business growth,

it is attempting THEFT without compensation of its own.

Please understand that difference.

It aims for harm.

 

In this competitive environment (where it is monitored by all),

if a person, decides to follow up on my idea and use that as business,

fair shares must be given to the person who came up with the idea.

Simple and clear.

But the fact that this is, not only a competitor, who should be focusing on generating

his own ideas, but it is one of the origins of my suffering, in its deliberate criminal negligence. Not to mention it has repeated again recently. Not helping, when it can.

When the origins were in question.

Yet it focuses on not the law that must cleared,

but exploitation for its own advantage.

And I have stated myself announcing complete detachment with this person

many, many times before.

This must be counted as harm.

 

Why do I keep seeing "I don't believe you" from the senator. (As relay)

When I am writing, every sentence, I am trying to be very careful,

and thinking about the facts as records behind it.

So your 'belief' doesn't make any difference against evidence,

with all due respect, senator.

I apologize if I got this relay wrong, and it is directed towards someone else.

It's they.

They are the ones exploiting.

Please understand.